Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support muted users #1546

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions tests/conftest.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -903,6 +903,7 @@ def initial_data(
}
],
"result": "success",
"muted_users": {},
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note that the co-author tags aren't showing in github since they're not quite formatted correctly.

"queue_id": "1522420755:786",
"realm_users": users_fixture,
"cross_realm_bots": [
Expand Down
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions tests/core/test_core.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ def test_narrow_to_user(
controller.view.message_view = mocker.patch("urwid.ListBox")
controller.model.user_id = 5140
controller.model.user_email = "some@email"
controller.model._muted_users = set()
controller.model.user_dict = {
user_email: {
"user_id": user_id,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -267,6 +268,7 @@ def test_narrow_to_all_messages(
controller.view.message_view = mocker.patch("urwid.ListBox")
controller.model.user_email = "some@email"
controller.model.user_id = 1
controller.model._muted_users = set()
controller.model.stream_dict = {
205: {
"color": "#ffffff",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -295,6 +297,7 @@ def test_narrow_to_all_pm(
controller.view.message_view = mocker.patch("urwid.ListBox")
controller.model.user_id = 1
controller.model.user_email = "some@email"
controller.model._muted_users = set()

controller.narrow_to_all_pm() # FIXME: Add id narrowing test

Expand All @@ -316,6 +319,7 @@ def test_narrow_to_all_starred(
# FIXME: Expand upon is_muted_topic().
mocker.patch(MODEL + ".is_muted_topic", return_value=False)
controller.model.user_email = "some@email"
controller.model._muted_users = set()
controller.model.stream_dict = {
205: {
"color": "#ffffff",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -343,6 +347,7 @@ def test_narrow_to_all_mentions(
mocker.patch(MODEL + ".is_muted_topic", return_value=False)
controller.model.user_email = "some@email"
controller.model.user_id = 1
controller.model._muted_users = set()
controller.model.stream_dict = {
205: {
"color": "#ffffff",
Expand Down
43 changes: 43 additions & 0 deletions tests/model/test_model.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -190,6 +190,36 @@ def test_init_muted_topics(

assert model._muted_topics == locally_processed_data

@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"server_response, ids, zulip_feature_level",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nits:

  • server_response could be named more specifically?
  • zulip_feature_level is part of the setup, so better earlier
  • ids are being asserted on, so would be cleaner later (see above), but also that's more obvious if named with an expected_ prefix, and again perhaps more specifically :)

[
(
[
{"id": 32323, "timestamp": 1726810359},
{"id": 37372, "timestamp": 214214214},
],
{32323, 37372},
48,
),
([], set(), 0),
],
ids=[
"zulip_feature_level:48",
"zulip_feature_level:0",
],
Comment on lines +206 to +209
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In other tests we've also handled an edge case near the ZFL when it's enabled; given the setup, it wouldn't be much to add, though there should be no significant difference.

)
def test_init_muted_users(
self, mocker, initial_data, server_response, ids, zulip_feature_level
):
Comment on lines +211 to +213
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for adding this test 👍

mocker.patch(MODEL + ".get_messages", return_value="")
initial_data["zulip_feature_level"] = zulip_feature_level
initial_data["muted_users"] = server_response
self.client.register = mocker.Mock(return_value=initial_data)

model = Model(self.controller)

assert model._muted_users == ids

def test_init_InvalidAPIKey_response(self, mocker, initial_data):
# Both network calls indicate the same response
mocker.patch(MODEL + ".get_messages", return_value="Invalid API key")
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -245,6 +275,7 @@ def test_register_initial_desired_events(self, mocker, initial_data):
"user_settings",
"realm_emoji",
"realm_user",
"muted_users",
]
fetch_event_types = [
"realm",
Expand All @@ -262,6 +293,7 @@ def test_register_initial_desired_events(self, mocker, initial_data):
"realm_emoji",
"custom_profile_fields",
"zulip_version",
"muted_users",
]
model.client.register.assert_called_once_with(
event_types=event_types,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -4080,6 +4112,17 @@ def test_is_muted_topic(

assert return_value == is_muted

@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"user, is_muted",
[
case(1, False, id="unmuted_user"),
case(2, True, id="muted_user"),
],
)
def test_is_muted_user(self, user, is_muted, model):
model._muted_users = {2}
assert model.is_muted_user(user) == is_muted

@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"unread_topics, current_topic, next_unread_topic",
[
Expand Down
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions tests/ui/test_ui_tools.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1078,6 +1078,8 @@ def test_users_view(self, users, users_btn_len, editor_mode, status, mocker):
user_btn = mocker.patch(VIEWS + ".UserButton")
users_view = mocker.patch(VIEWS + ".UsersView")
right_col_view = RightColumnView(self.view)
mocker.patch("zulipterminal.model.Model.is_muted_user", return_value=False)
self.view.model.is_muted_user.return_value = False
Comment on lines +1081 to +1082
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems like duplication, ie. is one doing what you might think?

if status != "inactive":
user_btn.assert_called_once_with(
user=self.view.users[0],
Expand Down
6 changes: 6 additions & 0 deletions tests/ui_tools/test_messages.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -776,6 +776,7 @@ def test_main_view(self, mocker, message, last_message):
"reactions": [],
"sender_full_name": "Alice",
"timestamp": 1532103879,
"sender_id": 32900,
}
],
)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -814,6 +815,7 @@ def test_main_view_renders_slash_me(self, mocker, message, content, is_me_messag
"reactions": [],
"sender_full_name": "Alice",
"timestamp": 1532103879,
"sender_id": 32900,
}
],
)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -867,6 +869,7 @@ def test_main_view_generates_stream_header(
"reactions": [],
"sender_full_name": "Alice",
"timestamp": 1532103879,
"sender_id": 32900,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Linting easy fix?

},
],
)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1057,6 +1060,7 @@ def test_msg_generates_search_and_header_bar(
"reactions": [],
"sender_full_name": "alice",
"timestamp": 1532103879,
"sender_id": 32900,
}
],
)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1117,6 +1121,8 @@ def test_main_view_content_header_without_header(

msg_box = MessageBox(this_msg, self.model, last_msg)

self.model.is_muted_user.return_value = False

Comment on lines +1124 to +1125
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I expect this adjusts the tests to pass, but doesn't test the new behavior? That is, this doesn't handle any muted-user cases, as well as any cases with mixed/combined messages of muted and not-muted? (before vs current)

expected_header[2] = output_date_time
if current_year > 2018:
expected_header[2] = "2018 - " + expected_header[2]
Expand Down
11 changes: 11 additions & 0 deletions zulipterminal/api_types.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -613,6 +613,16 @@ class UpdateDisplaySettingsEvent(TypedDict):
setting: bool


class MutedUser(TypedDict):
user_id: int
timestamp: int


class MutedUserEvent(TypedDict):
type: Literal["muted_users"]
muted_users: List[MutedUser]


# -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Event = Union[
MessageEvent,
Expand All @@ -628,6 +638,7 @@ class UpdateDisplaySettingsEvent(TypedDict):
UpdateUserSettingsEvent,
UpdateGlobalNotificationsEvent,
RealmUserEvent,
MutedUserEvent,
]

###############################################################################
Expand Down
20 changes: 20 additions & 0 deletions zulipterminal/model.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ def __init__(self, controller: Any) -> None:
# zulip_version and zulip_feature_level are always returned in
# POST /register from Feature level 3.
"zulip_version",
"muted_users",
]

# Events desired with their corresponding callback
Expand All @@ -160,6 +161,7 @@ def __init__(self, controller: Any) -> None:
"user_settings": self._handle_user_settings_event,
"realm_emoji": self._handle_update_emoji_event,
"realm_user": self._handle_realm_user_event,
"muted_users": self._handle_muted_users_event,
}

self.initial_data: Dict[str, Any] = {}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -208,6 +210,11 @@ def __init__(self, controller: Any) -> None:
)
for stream_name, topic, *date_muted in muted_topics
}
# NOTE: muted_users also contains timestamps, but we only store the user IDs
# muted_users was added in ZFL 48, Zulip 4.0
self._muted_users: Set[int] = set()
if self.server_feature_level >= 48:
self._update_muted_users(self.initial_data["muted_users"])

groups = self.initial_data["realm_user_groups"]
self.user_group_by_id: Dict[int, Dict[str, Any]] = {}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -950,6 +957,9 @@ def is_muted_topic(self, stream_id: int, topic: str) -> bool:
topic_to_search = (stream_name, topic)
return topic_to_search in self._muted_topics

def is_muted_user(self, user_id: int) -> bool:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: function name doesn't match commit message.

return user_id in self._muted_users

def stream_topic_from_message_id(
self, message_id: int
) -> Optional[Tuple[int, str]]:
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1204,6 +1214,9 @@ def get_user_info(self, user_id: int) -> Optional[TidiedUserInfo]:

return user_info

def _update_muted_users(self, muted_users: List[Dict[int, int]]) -> None:
self._muted_users = {muted_user["id"] for muted_user in muted_users}
Comment on lines +1217 to +1218
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can see this is good preparation for the next commit, though you don't use the MutedUser type here, since you define it later - and that may be clearer.

For just this one commit, we don't need this function, so it could be inline in the earlier conditional - and then refactor it next with the new type, before then reusing the type and method in what is now the next commit (with the event).

However, pick the commit flow that you feel works well - I see this was broadly similar to the previous PR right now?


def _update_users_data_from_initial_data(self) -> None:
# Dict which stores the active/idle status of users (by email)
presences = self.initial_data["presences"]
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1666,6 +1679,13 @@ def notify_user(self, message: Message) -> str:
)
return ""

def _handle_muted_users_event(self, event: Event) -> None:
"""
Handle muting/unmuting of users
"""
assert event["type"] == "muted_users"
self._update_muted_users(event["muted_users"])

def _handle_message_event(self, event: Event) -> None:
"""
Handle new messages (eg. add message to the end of the view)
Expand Down
17 changes: 15 additions & 2 deletions zulipterminal/ui_tools/messages.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -96,7 +96,9 @@ def __init__(self, message: Message, model: "Model", last_message: Any) -> None:
else:
self.recipients_names = ", ".join(
[
recipient["full_name"]
"Muted user"
if self.model.is_muted_user(recipient["id"])
else recipient["full_name"]
for recipient in self.message["display_recipient"]
if recipient["email"] != self.model.user_email
Comment on lines -99 to 103
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd be inclined to add parentheses here for the new code, to make this clearer.

]
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -687,7 +689,12 @@ def main_view(self) -> List[Any]:
text: Dict[str, urwid_MarkupTuple] = {key: (None, " ") for key in text_keys}

if any(different[key] for key in ("recipients", "author", "24h")):
text["author"] = ("msg_sender", message["this"]["author"])
text["author"] = (
"msg_sender",
"Muted user"
if self.model.is_muted_user(self.message["sender_id"])
else message["this"]["author"],
)
Comment on lines 691 to +697
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this only work for non-adjacent muted user messages?

That is, does this cover the case where a muted user sends multiple messages in succession?


# TODO: Refactor to use user ids for look up instead of emails.
email = self.message.get("sender_email", "")
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -729,10 +736,16 @@ def main_view(self) -> List[Any]:
"/me", f"<strong>{self.message['sender_full_name']}</strong>", 1
)

muted_message_text = "This message was hidden because you have muted the sender"

# Transform raw message content into markup (As needed by urwid.Text)
content, self.message_links, self.time_mentions = self.transform_content(
self.message["content"], self.model.server_url
)

if self.model.is_muted_user(self.message["sender_id"]):
content = (None, muted_message_text)
Comment on lines +746 to +747
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we're checking if it's a muted user every time, then it seems reasonable to place the check earlier, and only check for muting once?

Comment on lines +739 to +747
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd keep the muted_message_text close to the conditional.

I was going to suggest the transform_content could be skipped, but it's also used for extracting eg. the links, so we should always do that - that may be worth a comment for future readers :)

It'd be preferable to simplify the whole content-showing section, but I suspect that may need careful work, possibly with more tests, so for later.


self.content.set_text(content)

if self.message["id"] in self.model.index["edited_messages"]:
Expand Down
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions zulipterminal/ui_tools/views.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -726,6 +726,8 @@ def users_view(self, users: Any = None) -> Any:

users_btn_list = list()
for user in users:
if self.view.model.is_muted_user(user["user_id"]):
continue
Comment on lines 728 to +730
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems like a reasonable location for this to get this working, though it seems like a high-level location to be checking through each user. It would be clearer to have a users-without-muted list available from the model, in future, but may need reworking for that.

status = user["status"]
# Only include `inactive` users in search result.
if status == "inactive" and not self.view.controller.is_in_editor_mode():
Expand Down
Loading