-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy path01-03-good-timetable.qmd
48 lines (32 loc) · 2.49 KB
/
01-03-good-timetable.qmd
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
---
title: What is a "good" timetable?
lightbox:
match: auto
effect: fade
desc-position: bottom
loop: false
---
One of the most challenging aspects of university timetabling is defining what constitutes a "good" timetable. Despite best efforts, it is virtually impossible to deliver universal satisfaction from a university timetable. The quality of a timetable is inherently subjective and varies among stakeholders depending on their preferences and the demands on their time.
Based on surveys across various institutions, students typically prioritise (Dowland, 2018; Norman, 2022):
- A clash-free timetable
- Early release of timetables
- Clear and accurate information
- Full-year timetable availability
- Minimal changes after publication
- Effective communication of any changes
- Balanced distribution of classes
The above are easy-to-measure deliverables but they do not address what a 'good' timetable should look like; individual stakeholders often have conflicting priorities:
- **Students** may prefer learning times that align with their personal commitments (e.g. part-time employment or travel)
- **Academic staff** may prefer teaching times that align with their research or personal commitments.
- **Administrators** might focus on efficient resource utilisation and institutional sustainability.
- **Organisational units** may have specific needs for specialised rooms or equipment.
This divergence in preferences and the complex interplay of constraints make it challenging to define and achieve a universally "good" timetable (Lindahl et al., 2018). It is this complexity that sets the stage for this project.
## Consider these timetables:
- The first timetable is evenly spread over five days.
- The second timetable has two days free of activities.
- The third timetable has activities on five days, with gaps.
Which timetable is better? Is any of them 'good'? The answer is *it depends!* or *none of them!*
(Click to enlarge)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04029/0402912d507967c5ca163fca0091434f1726041b" alt=""{.gallery-image group="gallery" description="Evenly spread over 5 days. Tuesday afternoons are heavily scheduled; activities take place over lunch"}
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71e80/71e80fe5c492339eb32d0fa2e9f5fd844b0ac49a" alt=""{.gallery-image group="gallery" description="Two days free of activity (Wednesday and Thursday). Monday has a single activity at 18:00-19:00"}
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e47d3/e47d35f6ae8efee81fd8cd25ffaedb15023a8aff" alt=""{.gallery-image group="gallery" description="Activities on five days. There are large gaps between activities on Tuesday and Wednesday."}