Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow llvm toolchain for unit tests #84346

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

jeremybettis
Copy link
Contributor

@jeremybettis jeremybettis commented Jan 21, 2025

llvm is just as good as host for unit tests.

@jeremybettis jeremybettis marked this pull request as ready for review January 21, 2025 22:08
@zephyrbot zephyrbot added area: Testsuite Testsuite size: XS A PR changing only a single line of code labels Jan 21, 2025
llvm is just as good as host for unit tests.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Bettis <jbettis@google.com>
@nashif
Copy link
Member

nashif commented Jan 22, 2025

@jeremybettis with llvm, most unit tests do not build, am I missing something?


INFO    - 62 test scenarios (62 configurations) selected, 0 configurations filtered (0 by static filter, 0 at runtime).
INFO    - 21 of 62 executed test configurations passed (33.87%), 0 built (not run), 0 failed, 41 errored, with no warnings in 23.63 seconds.
INFO    - 318 of 1356 executed test cases passed (23.45%), 1038 blocked on 1 out of total 918 platforms (0.11%).
INFO    - 21 test configurations executed on platforms, 41 test configurations were only built.

Copy link
Member

@nashif nashif left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be fine still, but need to look at why some tests are failing to build when variant is set to llvm...

@kartben kartben merged commit 7ff7420 into zephyrproject-rtos:main Jan 24, 2025
24 of 25 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area: Testsuite Testsuite size: XS A PR changing only a single line of code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants