Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The accuracy of the best result #5

Open
OlivierX opened this issue Dec 13, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

The accuracy of the best result #5

OlivierX opened this issue Dec 13, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@OlivierX
Copy link

OlivierX commented Dec 13, 2018

The paper reaches a much lower Err-rate(about 1.5%) for smallNORB, but it seems that no one here can achieve the level of state-of-art. i wonder why : )

@ZHAOZHIHAO
Copy link

I'm curious about this question too. I think this may happen even if this matrix capsule network is totally correctly implemented, because some people say it's hard to train. See https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/a83fpx/r_what_is_the_status_about_the_capsule_networks/

@yl-1993
Copy link
Owner

yl-1993 commented Jan 10, 2019

Thanks for the discussion. There are also other issues or blogs concerning this question:

Reproduce the CNN baseline maybe a good start point to explore this question. (to make sure other factors such as data augmentation to be the same with the paper)

Feel free to discuss if you make any progress.

@yl-1993 yl-1993 mentioned this issue Jan 10, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants