Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename project #16

Closed
waldyrious opened this issue Aug 4, 2016 · 9 comments
Closed

Rename project #16

waldyrious opened this issue Aug 4, 2016 · 9 comments
Labels

Comments

@waldyrious
Copy link
Owner

waldyrious commented Aug 4, 2016

To a less pretentious (and hopefully more self-explanatory) name than 'default.css'. How about 'raw-html.css'?

@waldyrious
Copy link
Owner Author

or "unstyle" :)

@waldyrious waldyrious changed the title Rename repo Rename project Jan 22, 2017
@waldyrious
Copy link
Owner Author

Oops, wrong button

@waldyrious waldyrious reopened this Jan 22, 2017
@waldyrious
Copy link
Owner Author

waldyrious commented Jan 23, 2017

I just renamed the project "unstyle". Follow-up changes: #23 and 3acc84e / 37bb5e1.

@waldyrious
Copy link
Owner Author

Hmm... to be honest, this has started to provide more of a clean, basic style than an actual unstyled-like appearance. It probably makes sense to rename it something closer to its nature ("simple", "clean", "basic", "plain", etc.). At the moment I'm leaning towards something closer to "clean", "clear", "tidy" (e.g. "style-cleaner", "unclutter", etc.)

Maybe I'll go with unclutter, which is reasonably close to the current unstyle, but more accurate.

@waldyrious waldyrious reopened this Aug 22, 2017
@waldyrious
Copy link
Owner Author

waldyrious commented Sep 11, 2017

Maybe I'll go with unclutter, which is reasonably close to the current unstyle, but more accurate.

On the other hand, this merely strips a page of complex styling rules, and applies a basic style instead. This is not a guarantee of uncluttering, and in fact can make the page look more disorganized because it wasn't built using progressive enhancement principles.

In fact, hinging on that notion, maybe the name could be something related to the similar philosophy of graceful degradation. "degrade" is a negatively connotated word, though, so perhaps a synonym would work better as a name -- "simplify", for example.

Still, It would be necessary to qualify the simplification, i.e. what is being simplified. Not sure how to make that clear without using a two-word name... maybe downstyle?

@waldyrious
Copy link
Owner Author

Yeah, after some more thinking, downstyle is definitely more accurate than both unstyle and unclutter. The latter could be used for a similar project, aiming to actually strip down non-essential content from web pages. See #29 for more info.

@waldyrious
Copy link
Owner Author

waldyrious commented Sep 12, 2017

For future reference, here are other combinations I considered:

Names denoting actions (preferred because this is a bookmarklet to act on a page)

  • un-style
  • a-style
  • prune-style
  • trim-style
  • style-cleaner
  • down-style

Names describing the effect (usable because this can be used as a base style)

  • mini-style
  • micro-style
  • nano-style
  • lite-style

Prefixes supporting multiple terminations (style, look, view, .css).
Note: I had initially included mode, but decided to remove it because it is a generic word and doesn't unambiguously refer to visual appearance.

  • clean-style / clean-look / clean-view / clean.css
  • clear-style / clear-look / clear-view / clear.css
  • tidy-style / tidy-look / tidy-view / tidy.css
  • plain-style / plain-look / plain-view / plain.css
  • simple-style / simple-look / simple-view / simple.css
  • basic-style / basic-look / basic-view / basic.css
  • raw-style / raw-look / raw-view / raw.css
  • bare-style / bare-look / bare-view / bare.css

@waldyrious
Copy link
Owner Author

waldyrious commented Sep 12, 2017

Note: "plain" and "basic" are actually very good choices for prefix, since (unlike "clean", "clear", "tidy" and "simple") they don't imply a subjective positive connotation, but merely describe the effect. "Raw" and "bare" would be good candidates but I'm afraid they may convey the notion of "no style at all" -- the same issue that plagues "unstyle".

That said, they lack the punch of a more playful/memorable name, as well as the form of a verb/action, which better suits the bookmarklet use case. Which is why I'm sticking with "downstyle".

waldyrious added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 12, 2017
rename project from Unstyle to Downstyle (closes #16)
@waldyrious
Copy link
Owner Author

waldyrious commented Jan 22, 2018

I've been thinking about a subtle change from "downstyle" to "downstyler", to improve googlability (since "downstyle" is an existing term with prior meaning).

Commit f7ca2fc provides a good template of what changes are needed for such a rename.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant