fix: pass platform and arch to GenerateBindings for cross compilation #3795
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce enhancements to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
v2/pkg/commands/bindings/bindings.go (3)
23-24: LGTM! Consider adding comments for the new fields.The addition of
PlatformandArchfields to theOptionsstruct is a good approach for supporting cross-compilation. The field names are clear and their types are appropriate.Consider adding comments to describe these new fields, especially mentioning their role in cross-compilation. For example:
// Platform represents the target platform for cross-compilation (e.g., "windows", "darwin", "linux") Platform string // Arch represents the target architecture for cross-compilation (e.g., "amd64", "arm64") Arch string
58-60: LGTM! Consider adding validation for Platform and Arch.The addition of
GOOSandGOARCHenvironment variables is crucial for cross-compilation and directly addresses the issue. The implementation is consistent with the existing codebase style.Consider adding validation for the
PlatformandArchvalues before setting the environment variables. This could prevent potential issues with invalid inputs. For example:if options.Platform == "" || options.Arch == "" { return "", fmt.Errorf("Platform and Arch must be specified for cross-compilation") }
Line range hint
1-98: Summary: Good progress on cross-compilation support, with minor improvements needed.Overall, the changes successfully address the cross-compilation issues mentioned in the PR objectives. The addition of
PlatformandArchfields to theOptionsstruct and their use in settingGOOSandGOARCHenvironment variables are key improvements.Main points:
- The implementation of cross-compilation support is generally correct and aligns with the PR objectives.
- Minor improvements such as adding field comments and input validation have been suggested.
- There's a potential issue with overwriting environment variables that needs to be addressed to ensure the cross-compilation setup works as intended.
Please address the comments, particularly the potential issue with environment variables, to ensure the cross-compilation functionality works correctly in all scenarios.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- v2/pkg/commands/bindings/bindings.go (3 hunks)
- v2/pkg/commands/build/build.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
v2/pkg/commands/bindings/bindings.go (1)
62-62: LGTM! Correct use of RunCommandWithEnv for cross-compilation.The modification to use
shell.RunCommandWithEnvinstead ofshell.RunCommandis crucial for ensuring that the build process uses the correct environment variables for cross-compilation. This change directly addresses the cross-compilation issues mentioned in the PR objectives.v2/pkg/commands/build/build.go (1)
234-235: Verify thatbindings.Optionsstruct includesPlatformandArchfieldsThe addition of
PlatformandArchto thebindings.Optionsin theGenerateBindingsfunction is intended to support cross-compilation. Please ensure that theOptionsstruct in thebindingspackage defines these fields and that they are appropriately utilized during the binding generation process.Run the following script to confirm that
PlatformandArchfields exist in thebindings.Optionsstruct:✅ Verification successful
bindings.OptionsincludesPlatformandArchfieldsVerified that the
bindings.Optionsstruct includes thePlatformandArchfields required for cross-compilation support during the binding generation process.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that 'bindings.Options' struct contains 'Platform' and 'Arch' fields. # Test: Search for the definition of 'Options' struct and check for 'Platform' and 'Arch' fields. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'type Options struct {\n $$$\n Platform string\n Arch string\n $$$\n}'Length of output: 862
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
website/src/pages/changelog.mdx (1)
16-17: Minor typo in the "Unreleased" sectionThere's a small typo in the "Unreleased" section. The word "Fixed" is repeated.
Consider updating the line to remove the repetition:
-### Fixed - Fixed cross compilation failed with CGO [PR](https://github.com/wailsapp/wails/pull/3795) by [@fcying](https://github.com/fcying) +### Fixed +- Cross compilation failed with CGO [PR](https://github.com/wailsapp/wails/pull/3795) by [@fcying](https://github.com/fcying)🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[duplication] ~16-~16: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...f vulnerabilities. ## [Unreleased] ### Fixed - Fixed cross compilation failed with CGO [PR](...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- v2/pkg/commands/bindings/bindings.go (2 hunks)
- v2/pkg/commands/build/build.go (1 hunks)
- website/src/pages/changelog.mdx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- v2/pkg/commands/bindings/bindings.go
- v2/pkg/commands/build/build.go
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
website/src/pages/changelog.mdx
[duplication] ~16-~16: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...f vulnerabilities. ## [Unreleased] ### Fixed - Fixed cross compilation failed with CGO [PR](...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
website/src/pages/changelog.mdx (1)
Line range hint
1-1000: Overall changelog quality is goodThe changelog is well-structured and provides clear information about the changes in each version. It follows a consistent format throughout, making it easy for users to understand the evolution of the project. The use of links to PRs and attributions to contributors is particularly helpful.
The changelog is informative and well-maintained. Keep up the good work in documenting the project's progress!
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[duplication] ~16-~16: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...f vulnerabilities. ## [Unreleased] ### Fixed - Fixed cross compilation failed with CGO [PR](...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
Description
cross compilation to windows with CGO, GenerateBindings get error.
Fixes #3719
Type of change
How Has This Been Tested?
Test Configuration
Checklist:
website/src/pages/changelog.mdxwith details of this PRSummary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation