Use of “session” in “In Brief” in Understanding SC 3.3.7: Redundant Entry (Level A)

[yatil]

In the Understanding for 3.3.7, the “In Brief” section postulates:

What to do: Don't ask for the same information twice in the same session.

The word session is not mentioned in the success criterion. It is part of the Understanding, but only in the context that information does not need to be preserved between sessions.

When you have multiple processes within a session, the success criterion permits re-entry, even within the same session.

Example:

A user places an order and enters a different shipping address. If they place another order right after that, the changed shipping address does not need to be preserved despite the user being in the same session.

Introducing the word session in “In Brief” is unnecessary and I would recommend using “process” instead.