Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SFPUC diversion logic #100

Open
drheinheimer opened this issue Jun 5, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

SFPUC diversion logic #100

drheinheimer opened this issue Jun 5, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
demand Water demand (for urban/ag diversions) high priority

Comments

@drheinheimer
Copy link
Collaborator

The diversion logic for deliveries to SFPUC needs to be improved. Generally, two issues need to be accounted for:

  1. Urban water demand decreases (due to SFPUC policy & water service agreements) by 10%, 20% or 25% depending on system-wide reservoir storage. For us, this is challenging because we don't actually have system-wide storage, just storage in the higher elevations.
  2. During drought, there is an increase in dependency on Tuolumne reservoirs for urban deliveries. I.e., diversions to the SJPL increases as water availability (supply) decreases. However, when/how this occurs is uncertain within the limited spatial scope of the present model.
@drheinheimer drheinheimer added demand Water demand (for urban/ag diversions) high priority labels Jun 5, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
demand Water demand (for urban/ag diversions) high priority
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant