Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Implement more Ibis data types and built-in checks #1906

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: ibis-dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

deepyaman
Copy link
Collaborator

@deepyaman deepyaman commented Feb 8, 2025

Moved to draft, as I can just work off of this to add types and checks. Will probably rebase-merge instead of squash-merging, since I'll keep the commit history as clean as possible.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 8, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.97%. Comparing base (4df61da) to head (5352be0).
Report is 210 commits behind head on ibis-dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           ibis-dev    #1906      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     94.29%   92.97%   -1.32%     
============================================
  Files            91      134      +43     
  Lines          7024     9768    +2744     
============================================
+ Hits           6623     9082    +2459     
- Misses          401      686     +285     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Signed-off-by: Deepyaman Datta <deepyaman.datta@utexas.edu>
@deepyaman
Copy link
Collaborator Author

deepyaman commented Feb 8, 2025

Requires #1907 to pass Merged and rebased

Signed-off-by: Deepyaman Datta <deepyaman.datta@utexas.edu>
@deepyaman deepyaman force-pushed the feat/ibis/more-builtin-checks branch from 9cdcae4 to 213ccae Compare February 8, 2025 19:18
Signed-off-by: Deepyaman Datta <deepyaman.datta@utexas.edu>
@deepyaman deepyaman force-pushed the feat/ibis/more-builtin-checks branch from 94739cd to 5352be0 Compare February 9, 2025 21:11
@deepyaman deepyaman marked this pull request as draft February 9, 2025 21:11
@deepyaman deepyaman changed the title Implement "ne" built-in check for the Ibis backend Implement more Ibis data types and built-in checks Feb 9, 2025
@deepyaman deepyaman changed the title Implement more Ibis data types and built-in checks [WIP] Implement more Ibis data types and built-in checks Feb 9, 2025
@deepyaman
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Update: Currently struggling with getting timestamp tests to work, but I just discovered from_parametrized_dtype(), so hopefully I can unblock myself!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant