feat: add support for using resolver object directly in settings

[GoodbyeNJN]

close #75

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 2ab6a20

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package

Name	Type
eslint-plugin-import-x	Minor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[codesandbox-ci]

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

[GoodbyeNJN]

@JounQin @SukkaW Sorry to bother you, but can anyone push this PR?
I proposed this feature before, but there was no discussion, so I decided to implement it first.
If you are free, could you review this feature proposal and code?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 96.55172% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 96.01%. Comparing base (8b53954) to head (2ab6a20).
Report is 43 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/utils/resolve.ts	96.55%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #159      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.22%   96.01%   -0.21%     
==========================================
  Files          91      101      +10     
  Lines        4399     4670     +271     
  Branches     1497     1601     +104     
==========================================
+ Hits         4233     4484     +251     
- Misses        160      180      +20     
  Partials        6        6              

Flag	Coverage Δ
	96.01% <96.55%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[SukkaW]

@JounQin @SukkaW Sorry to bother you, but can anyone push this PR? I proposed this feature before, but there was no discussion, so I decided to implement it first. If you are free, could you review this feature proposal and code?

Sorry for the late reply. I like this change very much! I have added only a small review suggestion, and I have approved the CI to run. We can ship this as long as all existing test cases are passed.

Another thought, would you mind adding a test case for your change as well? So that we can test against the new config.

[GoodbyeNJN]

Another thought, would you mind adding a test case for your change as well? So that we can test against the new config.

I have added test cases and reorganized the test set. Could you please approve running CI again?

[SukkaW]

LGTM!