forked from castorini/anserini
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathmsmarco-passage-deepimpact.template
71 lines (47 loc) · 2.87 KB
/
msmarco-passage-deepimpact.template
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
# Anserini: Regressions for DeepImpact on [MS MARCO Passage](https://github.com/microsoft/MSMARCO-Passage-Ranking)
This page documents regression experiments for DeepImpact on the MS MARCO Passage Ranking Task, which is integrated into Anserini's regression testing framework.
DeepImpact is described in the following paper:
> Antonio Mallia, Omar Khattab, Nicola Tonellotto, and Torsten Suel. [Learning Passage Impacts for Inverted Indexes.](https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3404835.3463030) _SIGIR 2021_.
For more complete instructions on how to run end-to-end experiments, refer to [this page](experiments-msmarco-passage-deepimpact.md).
The exact configurations for these regressions are stored in [this YAML file](../src/main/resources/regression/msmarco-passage-deepimpact.yaml).
Note that this page is automatically generated from [this template](../src/main/resources/docgen/templates/msmarco-passage-deepimpact.template) as part of Anserini's regression pipeline, so do not modify this page directly; modify the template instead.
## Indexing
Typical indexing command:
```
${index_cmds}
```
The directory `/path/to/msmarco-passage-deepimpact/` should be a directory containing the compressed `jsonl` files that comprise the corpus.
See [this page](experiments-msmarco-passage-deepimpact.md) for additional details.
For additional details, see explanation of [common indexing options](common-indexing-options.md).
## Retrieval
Topics and qrels are stored in [`src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/`](../src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/).
The regression experiments here evaluate on the 6980 dev set questions; see [this page](experiments-msmarco-passage.md) for more details.
After indexing has completed, you should be able to perform retrieval as follows:
```
${ranking_cmds}
```
Evaluation can be performed using `trec_eval`:
```
${eval_cmds}
```
## Effectiveness
With the above commands, you should be able to reproduce the following results:
${effectiveness}
The above runs are in TREC output format and evaluated with `trec_eval`.
In order to reproduce results reported in the paper, we need to convert to MS MARCO output format and then evaluate:
```bash
python tools/scripts/msmarco/convert_trec_to_msmarco_run.py \
--input runs/run.msmarco-passage-deepimpact.deepimpact.topics.msmarco-passage.dev-subset.deep-impact.tsv.gz \
--output runs/run.msmarco-passage-deepimpact.deepimpact.topics.msmarco-passage.dev-subset.deep-impact.tsv.gz.msmarco --quiet
python tools/scripts/msmarco/msmarco_passage_eval.py \
collections/msmarco-passage/qrels.dev.small.tsv \
runs/run.msmarco-passage-deepimpact.deepimpact.topics.msmarco-passage.dev-subset.deep-impact.tsv.gz.msmarco
```
The results should be as follows:
```
#####################
MRR @10: 0.3252764133351524
QueriesRanked: 6980
#####################
```
The final evaluation metric is very close to the one reported in the paper (0.326).