Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add an __eq__ method #48

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 6, 2024
Merged

Add an __eq__ method #48

merged 6 commits into from
Nov 6, 2024

Conversation

DarkaMaul
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Alexis <alexis.challande@trailofbits.com>
@DarkaMaul DarkaMaul force-pushed the dm/add-equality-method branch from d642b87 to c9a252d Compare October 31, 2024 14:05
Copy link
Member

@woodruffw woodruffw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, nice work!

@woodruffw
Copy link
Member

Actually, could we add some tests for this as well?

Signed-off-by: Alexis <alexis.challande@trailofbits.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexis <alexis.challande@trailofbits.com>
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ def nonce(self) -> bytes:

@property
@abc.abstractmethod
def name(self) -> cryptography.x509.Name:
def name(self) -> cryptography.x509.GeneralName:
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FLAG: The annotation was wrong but I didn't think we had to create a whole new PR just for it :)

Signed-off-by: Alexis <alexis.challande@trailofbits.com>
@woodruffw woodruffw enabled auto-merge (squash) November 6, 2024 14:23
@woodruffw woodruffw merged commit e70d9db into main Nov 6, 2024
21 checks passed
@woodruffw woodruffw deleted the dm/add-equality-method branch November 6, 2024 14:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants