Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Security service - KMS fails to redeploy and undeploy #73

Closed
maheshwarishikha opened this issue May 9, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Security service - KMS fails to redeploy and undeploy #73

maheshwarishikha opened this issue May 9, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working internal-synced

Comments

@maheshwarishikha
Copy link
Member

Error: Could not update the policies: [ERROR] Error while setting instance policies: kp.Error: correlation_id='3209d006-cb01-4755-b017-ef80e9b14d1f', msg='Bad Request: Instance policy could not be created: Please see `reasons` for more details (INVALID_FIELD_ERR)', reasons='[INVALID_FIELD_ERR: The field `attributes` must be: provided only if policy is being enabled - FOR_MORE_INFO_REFER: https://cloud.ibm.com/apidocs/key-protect]'
 2024/05/08 16:54:11 Terraform apply | 
 2024/05/08 16:54:11 Terraform apply |   with module.kms.module.key_protect[0].ibm_kms_instance_policies.key_protect_instance_policies,
 2024/05/08 16:54:11 Terraform apply |   on .terraform/modules/kms.key_protect/main.tf line 26, in resource "ibm_kms_instance_policies" "key_protect_instance_policies":
 2024/05/08 16:54:11 Terraform apply |   26: resource "ibm_kms_instance_policies" "key_protect_instance_policies" {
@vburckhardt
Copy link
Member

I think it's related to terraform-ibm-modules/terraform-ibm-kms-all-inclusive#448

@ocofaigh
Copy link
Member

provider issue raised: IBM-Cloud/terraform-provider-ibm#5342

@vburckhardt vburckhardt added the bug Something isn't working label May 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working internal-synced
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants