Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding infrastructure for multichip tests #231

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 25, 2025

Conversation

ajakovljevicTT
Copy link
Contributor

Ticket

Part of issue #211

Problem description

Integrating new tester class, called MultichipTester, into our testing infrastructure intt-xla. It will receive the input and output shardings from the user, the function to be tested, and the golden function which will run on CPU, in a non-sharded mode. It runs the received data and compared the results.

@ajakovljevicTT ajakovljevicTT force-pushed the ajakovljevic/adding_multichip_tests branch 4 times, most recently from 60f1a95 to d2dcb1e Compare February 4, 2025 16:07
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2025

TestsPassed ✅Skipped ⚠️Failed
TT-XLA Tests599 ran434 passed165 skipped0 failed
TestResult
No test annotations available

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.09%. Comparing base (9ee5247) to head (3baadca).
Report is 19 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #231      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.82%   78.09%   +0.27%     
==========================================
  Files          21       21              
  Lines        1028      986      -42     
==========================================
- Hits          800      770      -30     
+ Misses        228      216      -12     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ajakovljevicTT ajakovljevicTT force-pushed the ajakovljevic/adding_multichip_tests branch from 4c2f7ac to 0086d31 Compare February 5, 2025 07:24
Copy link
Contributor

@kmitrovicTT kmitrovicTT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A lot of comments just organizational and naming-wise. Once that is resolved, I'll take another look.

@ajakovljevicTT ajakovljevicTT force-pushed the ajakovljevic/adding_multichip_tests branch 2 times, most recently from 148c3ae to aaf46cf Compare February 6, 2025 09:45
@ajakovljevicTT ajakovljevicTT force-pushed the ajakovljevic/adding_multichip_tests branch 3 times, most recently from ec6db0f to 1863d25 Compare February 7, 2025 17:18
@ajakovljevicTT ajakovljevicTT force-pushed the ajakovljevic/adding_multichip_tests branch 2 times, most recently from c9b3693 to 20542c4 Compare February 18, 2025 12:41
Copy link
Contributor

@kmitrovicTT kmitrovicTT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All good, minor comments below.

@ajakovljevicTT ajakovljevicTT force-pushed the ajakovljevic/adding_multichip_tests branch from 20542c4 to 4aeb594 Compare February 24, 2025 12:45
@ajakovljevicTT ajakovljevicTT force-pushed the ajakovljevic/adding_multichip_tests branch from 4aeb594 to 3baadca Compare February 25, 2025 09:54
@ajakovljevicTT ajakovljevicTT merged commit a8769d7 into main Feb 25, 2025
7 checks passed
@ajakovljevicTT ajakovljevicTT deleted the ajakovljevic/adding_multichip_tests branch February 25, 2025 12:40
ajakovljevicTT added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2025
Part of issue #211

Integrating new tester class, called `MultichipTester`, into our testing
infrastructure in`tt-xla`. It will receive the input and output
shardings from the user, the function to be tested, and the golden
function which will run on CPU, in a non-sharded mode. It runs the
received data and compared the results.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants