Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

report/display rsync output in separate buffer? #12

Open
emacsomancer opened this issue Aug 27, 2019 · 7 comments
Open

report/display rsync output in separate buffer? #12

emacsomancer opened this issue Aug 27, 2019 · 7 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@emacsomancer
Copy link

It would be nice to have a buffer which collects rsync output, particularly for lengthier rsync operations (but also to check errors etc.)

@stsquad
Copy link
Owner

stsquad commented Aug 27, 2019

You can actually get to the buffer by doing a M-x list-processes and clicking/selecting the process buffer. I could probably add a key shortcut to dired for it but what to do when you have 2 or more rsyncs running?

@stsquad stsquad added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 27, 2019
@QiangF
Copy link

QiangF commented Sep 23, 2019

How about not kill the process buffer and let it auto pop out when the the process finished with an error?

@QiangF
Copy link

QiangF commented Sep 23, 2019

Looks like the error variable err in dired-rsync--filter is not defined.

stsquad added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 8, 2019
The hook is called in the context of the failed process buffer.
@stsquad
Copy link
Owner

stsquad commented Nov 8, 2019

@QiangF err can be nil. What error are you seeing?

@QiangF
Copy link

QiangF commented Nov 9, 2019

I see. I am just afraid of possible unnoticed failures.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 19, 2023

There seems no visual feedback when running dired-rsync. Am I wrong?

@stsquad
Copy link
Owner

stsquad commented Mar 10, 2023

See dired-rsync-modeline-status

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants