Added new QGRaphicsItems (FieldOfView, Centroid)

[javierggt]

Description

The purpose of this PR is to:

• enable a simple real-time/telemetry use case together with aca_view.
• add a feature to automatically call proseco in the standard aperoll use.

This PR makes the following changes:

• Adds three graphics items:
  • Centroid. Markers for centroids from telemetry.
  • CameraOutline. A graphics item depicting the edges of the CCD and the quadrant boundaries.
  • FieldOfView. This is an item that contains a list of centroid items and a camera outline. It would be easy to also associate a catalog with it.
• Adds a function star_field_position that is used by all items to recalculate their position when the scene attitude changes.
• Adds a context menu to hide/show FOV, catalog and centroids.
• Puts all switches that determine StarField behavior into a dataclass of type StarFieldState. The idea is that this is the one place to find all run-time switches that the user can change.
• Adds an auto-proseco feature, which causes proseco to be run whenever the parameters change
• Changes StarView so StarView.catalog is never None, and adds Catalog.reset instead.

Notes about testing/reviewing this PR

I would like to restrict this PR to the items mentioned above. I tried to keep the changes to the user interface as minimal as possible while still allowing me to toggle the item's visibility. This PR is not intended to make major changes in the UI. The main change is the addition of the context menu, which is not conspicuous. It should be functional though:

• one should be able to run in real-time and browse the star field (no proseco catalog)
• one should be able to evaluate difficult star fields the usual way and proseco should run automatically.
• one should be able to toggle visibility of the new items and they should behave as expected (centroids updated from telemetry, etc).

One thing to note is the StarPLot.set_onboard_attitude function.

Requirements

This requires the latest agasc master (after sot/agasc/pull/193).

For real-time/telemetry use, use sot/aca_view/pull/197

Interface impacts

Testing

Unit tests

• No unit tests
• Mac
• Linux
• Windows

Independent check of unit tests by [REVIEWER NAME]

• [PLATFORM]:

Functional tests

The usual aperoll command to inspect catalogs

aperoll input.json

Usage within aca_view to inspect telemetry. in this case, I tried: showing/hiding different items, dragging the display, opening the star view before there is any telemetry. Note that the "auto-proseco" feature does not work in this case.

aca_view --obsid 42979 --stop 500

[Copilot]

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 suggestion.

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.

Comments skipped due to low confidence (5)

aperoll/widgets/star_plot.py:180

• [nitpick] The method name get_moving is ambiguous. It should be renamed to is_moving.

def get_moving(self):

aperoll/widgets/star_plot.py:255

• [nitpick] The variable name incl_action is ambiguous. It should be renamed to include_acq_action.

incl_action = QtW.QAction("include acq", menu, checkable=True)

aperoll/widgets/star_plot.py:259

• [nitpick] The variable name excl_action is ambiguous. It should be renamed to exclude_acq_action.

excl_action = QtW.QAction("exclude acq", menu, checkable=True)

aperoll/widgets/star_plot.py:309

• The hardcoded string 'include slot' should be replaced with a constant or enum for better maintainability.

if centroid is not None and result.text().startswith("include slot"):

aperoll/widgets/star_plot.py:320

• The hardcoded string 'Show FOV' should be replaced with a constant or enum for better maintainability.

elif result.text() == "Show FOV":

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.

[jeanconn]

Why are the fid light centroids excluded here? They are a bit less interesting, but if we're just trying to display where on the CCD stuff is happening it might make sense to just include them.

[javierggt]

yes, I will add them back. I will use the same symbol but in red.

[javierggt]

@jeanconn I just pushed this change in this branch (it was in a branch in the other PR). I am going to merge this PR. I have used this extensively and found no issues, and it is getting harder to keep track of things.

[jeanconn]

If you want me to review again let me know.