Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 3, 2021. It is now read-only.

Update nla-digbench-scaling (continuation of PR #1200) #1220

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 11, 2020

Conversation

MartinSpiessl
Copy link
Contributor

It is easier to regenerate the tasks from the script than fixing the numerous merge conflicts over at #1200.

Since the coverage properties have been merged before #1200, we need to handle this case explicitly.
Property coverage-error-call.prp is added in case the task contains a reachability violation.
../properties/coverage-branches.prp is kept whenever it is in the corresponding task in nla-digbench.

These coverage properties are highly redundant, why do we add these?
We can always check for branch coverage. If we have a reachability
violation, we can check for that kind of coverage. There is no need
for having these weird coverage properties in every taskdef file.
Copy link
Contributor

@hernanponcedeleon hernanponcedeleon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems you forgot to add the flag to the makefile for the comparison of unsigned values. The rest seems ok. So once the CI passes it can be merged.

@MartinSpiessl
Copy link
Contributor Author

Indeed, I will add it.

Copy link
Contributor

@hernanponcedeleon hernanponcedeleon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All is good now. @dbeyer you can merge.

@dbeyer dbeyer merged commit 2e5e802 into sosy-lab:master Nov 11, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
C Task in language C new benchmarks
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants