Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ctsm warm_start mods #17

Conversation

jtruesdal
Copy link

The following mods allow ctsm interpolation of a 2d grid to a single gridcell for pts mode. They are required to get I compsets passing with the new SE grid as well as allow a CTSM warm start when running CAM in single column mode.

@jtruesdal
Copy link
Author

With the latest fix CLM now can restart in single column mode with SCAM and using the CAM SCT regression test it is BFB with a 3D CAM run. @slevis-lmwg could you run the standard clm regression tests on a merged up sandbox of this PR to make sure I didn't break anything on the land side with this update. I have CAM mods that will go along with this to add the new scam SCT test for checking BFB with warmstarts of CLM.

@slevis-lmwg
Copy link
Owner

Note to self before I start testing: Confirm that we have ne3 test(s) in clm's test-suites

@slevis-lmwg
Copy link
Owner

aux_clm has this ne3_ne3 test on both derecho and izumi
<test name="SMS_D_Ld1_Mmpi-serial" grid="ne3_ne3_mg37" compset="I2000Clm50SpRs" testmods="clm/ptsRLA">
aux_clm also has this ne3_ne3 test on izumi
<test name="SMS_D_Ld1_Mmpi-serial" grid="ne3_ne3_mg37" compset="I2000Clm50SpRs" testmods="clm/ptsROA">

I think that these are the ne3 tests that we intended to have in there, so I will start aux_clm on both derecho and izumi:
./run_sys_tests -s aux_clm -c ctsm5.3.009 --skip-generate

@slevis-lmwg
Copy link
Owner

aux_clm

  • on derecho OK
  • on izumi FAIL because many (most?) tests differ from the baseline. I am rerunning against the ctsm5.3.010 baseline, which was b4b with 009. If that doesn't help, I may update to the latest ctsm and rerun against ctsm5.3.019 or 020. I remember now that there were operating system upgrades on izumi recently, which may explain the diffs on izumi.

@slevis-lmwg
Copy link
Owner

On izumi, comparing against the ctsm5.3.010 baseline worked, so we can prob. go ahead and merge this branch with mine. I will wait for @jtruesdal or @ekluzek to give me the go-ahead (unless one of you wants to do the merge).

Meanwhile @ekluzek I would delete the ctsm5.3.009 baseline on izumi because it seems wrong. Let me know if that's ok with you.

@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg merged commit 1e43d01 into slevis-lmwg:ne3np4_to_defaults_and_makefile Jan 23, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants