You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As far as I understand, the vectorized form of a variable is given by appending v, so $\theta$ becomes $\thetav$, $\alpha$ becomes $\alphav$, and so on. However, for $\lambda$ the pattern is different, and it becomes $\lamv$.
This is a bit confusing, but might be okay. Especially as most lambda's in the LaTeX commands become abbreviated with some sort of lam...
Now there's an argument named $\lambdaopt$ that does not follow that convention.
Therefore, I think we should either rename all variables to use the full lambda, or change lambdaopt to use the abbreviation.
I would suggest the former, as it will result in more readable LaTeX code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As far as I understand, the vectorized form of a variable is given by appending
v
, so$\theta$
becomes$\thetav$
,$\alpha$
becomes$\alphav$
, and so on. However, for$\lambda$
the pattern is different, and it becomes$\lamv$
.This is a bit confusing, but might be okay. Especially as most lambda's in the LaTeX commands become abbreviated with some sort of lam...
Now there's an argument named
$\lambdaopt$
that does not follow that convention.Therefore, I think we should either rename all variables to use the full lambda, or change lambdaopt to use the abbreviation.
I would suggest the former, as it will result in more readable LaTeX code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: