Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[V5] NTT DOCOMO no longer rejects by filter after March 12 #334

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: 5-stable
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[V5] NTT DOCOMO no longer rejects by filter after March 12 #334

wants to merge 2 commits into from
+30 −24

Conversation

azumakuniyuki
Copy link
Member

@azumakuniyuki azumakuniyuki added improvement mta-module Modules in Sisimai::Lhost or Sisimai::RHost labels Feb 28, 2025
@codecov Codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 28, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.20%. Comparing base (f238c9a) to head (83274f1).

Additional details and impacted files 
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           5-stable     #334      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     96.26%   96.20%   -0.06%     
============================================
  Files           125      125              
  Lines          5645     5645              
============================================
- Hits           5434     5431       -3     
- Misses          211      214       +3

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@azumakuniyuki azumakuniyuki changed the title NTT DOCOMO no longer rejects by filter after March 12 [V5] NTT DOCOMO no longer rejects by filter after March 12 Mar 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
improvement mta-module Modules in Sisimai::Lhost or Sisimai::RHost
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@azumakuniyuki