ci: fix pandoc #130
ci: fix pandoc #130
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow for documentation building and deployment in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
shenxiangzhuang
added
the
dependencies
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #130 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 2 2
Lines 8 8
=========================================
Hits 8 8 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows/build_docs.yaml (1)
Limiting Python versions in docs workflow contradicts project's compatibility
The review comment is valid. The project's
pyproject.tomlexplicitly declares support for Python 3.9-3.12 withrequires-python = ">= 3.9", and the main test workflow runs against all these versions. Limiting the docs workflow to only Python 3.13 is inconsistent with the project's compatibility matrix and could miss documentation build issues on supported Python versions.
.github/workflows/build_docs.yaml: Uncomment Python versions 3.9-3.12 to align with project's declared Python version support- The main test workflow already verifies compatibility with Python 3.13, so it's safe to include it in docs workflow for forward compatibility testing
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
13-17: Reconsider limiting Python version support to only 3.13Python 3.13 is currently in alpha/development stage and not recommended for production use. Consider:
- Keeping support for stable Python versions (3.9-3.12)
- Testing against both stable and development versions to ensure forward compatibility
Let's verify the Python version compatibility in the project:
Let me try another approach to verify the Python version requirements:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check Python version specifications in project files echo "Checking pyproject.toml for Python version requirements:" cat pyproject.toml | grep -A 5 "python_requires" echo "\nChecking for Python version references in documentation:" rg "python.*version" docs/ || trueLength of output: 334
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if pyproject.toml exists and show its content echo "Checking if pyproject.toml exists:" fd "pyproject.toml" echo "\nChecking all Python-related configuration files:" fd -e toml -e cfg -e ini echo "\nChecking content of setup files if they exist:" for f in $(fd -e toml -e cfg -e ini); do echo "=== Content of $f ===" cat "$f" || true done echo "\nChecking GitHub workflow files for Python version patterns:" fd "^.*ya?ml$" .github/workflows/ -x cat {} \; || trueLength of output: 7128
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/build_docs.yaml (2)
Line range hint
27-29: Consider pinning Pandoc version for reproducibilityWhile using the official Pandoc GitHub Action is a good improvement, not specifying a version could lead to inconsistent builds if Pandoc introduces breaking changes.
Uncomment and update the version specification:
uses: pandoc/actions/setup@v1 +with: + version: "3.1.11" # Latest stable version as of December 2024Also applies to: 60-60
Line range hint
1-85: Consider workflow optimization opportunitiesWhile the workflow structure is good, consider these architectural improvements:
- Add caching for Pandoc artifacts to speed up builds
- Consider implementing parallel documentation testing (e.g., link checking, style checking) alongside builds
- Add status checks or notifications for failed deployments
Example cache configuration for Pandoc:
- name: Setup pandoc uses: pandoc/actions/setup@v1 + with: + cache: true + cache-prefix: pandoc-${{ runner.os }}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/build_docs.yaml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/build_docs.yaml (1)
Line range hint 71-74: Well-structured Python setup and deployment configuration
Good practices observed:
- Using
python-version-filefor consistent versioning - Proper job dependencies and conditions
- Efficient use of
uvfor package management
Summary by CodeRabbit