-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 682
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix build failures on MinGW during package CI #1452
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
765487e
Reproduce the issue
seladb 7a47706
Try to fix the issue
seladb 8e19775
Try to fix the issue
seladb 0ce92f9
Try to cancle reserve
seladb 4866208
Remove reserve
seladb e85052f
Revert the changes in `package.yml`
seladb 7cc7489
Detect MinGW using a macro
seladb c4bab92
Try again
seladb 3bc00b5
Try again
seladb d911d1b
Try with `__MINGW64_VERSION_MAJOR` and `__MINGW32_MAJOR_VERSION`
seladb 1e5f6a4
Revert changes in `package.yml`
seladb 00428d1
Merge branch 'dev' into fix-lightpcapng-build
seladb dbfee2a
Add `// PCPP patch` in all changes made in LightPcapNg
seladb File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have no idea why the compiler complains here, but I think it's fine to remove it:
https://github.com/seladb/PcapPlusPlus/actions/runs/9562329238/job/26358481698
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we ignore this line only for
MinGW
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a compilation error so not sure we can ignore it, but I think removing it is ok, I don't foresee a big performance impact because of it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I mean
ifndef MinGW
or some similar syntax.I think it's better to keep the
reserve
as it still works for other platforms.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tried with
__MIGW32__
/__MINGW64__
, but it didn't work: https://github.com/seladb/PcapPlusPlus/actions/runs/9593015503/job/26452660814Then I changed to
__MINGW32_VERSION_MAJOR
/__MINGW64_VERSION_MAJOR
as we do here and it worked: https://github.com/seladb/PcapPlusPlus/actions/runs/9593255865