You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
With the Smalltalk style method calls we split up the method name, but keep the commas (unlike in Scala). We could do something similar for the arrows, to get rid of the ugly plus characters:
x ~~(p:Int)~~>y1,
~~(s:String)~~>y2
or
x ~~(p:Int)~~>y1
,~~(s:String)~~>y2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently we have arrow operators such as in
With the Smalltalk style method calls we split up the method name, but keep the commas (unlike in Scala). We could do something similar for the arrows, to get rid of the ugly plus characters:
or
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: