You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First, I want to express my sincere gratitude for good_lp - it's an excellent library that has been incredibly helpful for linear programming in Rust. The clean API design and solver integrations have made it a valuable tool for many projects.
Currently, good_lp provides access to HiGHS solver options configuration, but similar functionality is not available for the SCIP solver. Would it be possible to add support for configuring SCIP solver options?
The recent implementation for HiGHS (#54, #56) added the ability to set solver options directly. I would like to request similar functionality for SCIP, allowing users to configure SCIP-specific parameters through good_lp's interface.
This would be particularly useful for:
Tuning solver performance for specific problem types
Adjusting algorithmic behavior
Setting numerical tolerances
Controlling output verbosity
If this feature request is acceptable, I'd be happy to contribute by creating a PR for this functionality.
Thank you for considering this request and for maintaining such a valuable library for the Rust ecosystem!
Hi!
First, I want to express my sincere gratitude for good_lp - it's an excellent library that has been incredibly helpful for linear programming in Rust. The clean API design and solver integrations have made it a valuable tool for many projects.
Currently, good_lp provides access to HiGHS solver options configuration, but similar functionality is not available for the SCIP solver. Would it be possible to add support for configuring SCIP solver options?
The recent implementation for HiGHS (#54, #56) added the ability to set solver options directly. I would like to request similar functionality for SCIP, allowing users to configure SCIP-specific parameters through good_lp's interface.
This would be particularly useful for:
If this feature request is acceptable, I'd be happy to contribute by creating a PR for this functionality.
Thank you for considering this request and for maintaining such a valuable library for the Rust ecosystem!
Related issues:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: