Skip to content

Don't use item name to look up associated item from trait item #140278

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2025

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

This fix should be self-justifying b/c the fact that we were using identifiers here was kinda sus anyways, esp b/c we have a failproof way of doing the comparison :) I'll leave some info about why this repro needs a macro.

Fixes #140259

r? @nnethercote

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 25, 2025
.associated_items(impl_def_id)
.in_definition_order()
.find(|assoc| assoc.ident(self.tcx) == trait_assoc_ident),
self.tcx.associated_items(impl_def_id).in_definition_order().find(
Copy link
Member Author

@compiler-errors compiler-errors Apr 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note on item ordering: RPITITs are typically last in this list, so we typically do not encounter RPITITs here (and thus, it's harder to reproduce this ICE).

However, when we have a macro, the identifier of the macro wasn't being adjusted, so although it had the same Symbol, it has a different span and thus identifier equality works a bit differently. So we fall through the assoc item list to the RPITITs, and try to compute their item names and ICE.

@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 25, 2025

📌 Commit 1d0b3be has been approved by nnethercote

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 25, 2025
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#137653 (Deprecate the unstable `concat_idents!`)
 - rust-lang#138957 (Update the index of Option to make the summary more comprehensive)
 - rust-lang#140006 (ensure compiler existance of tools on the dist step)
 - rust-lang#140143 (Move `sys::pal::os::Env` into `sys::env`)
 - rust-lang#140202 (Make #![feature(let_chains)] bootstrap conditional in compiler/)
 - rust-lang#140236 (norm nested aliases before evaluating the parent goal)
 - rust-lang#140257 (Some drive-by housecleaning in `rustc_borrowck`)
 - rust-lang#140278 (Don't use item name to look up associated item from trait item)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 3c08a50 into rust-lang:master Apr 25, 2025
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.88.0 milestone Apr 25, 2025
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#140278 - compiler-errors:name-based-comparison, r=nnethercote

Don't use item name to look up associated item from trait item

This fix should be self-justifying b/c the fact that we were using identifiers here was kinda sus anyways, esp b/c we have a failproof way of doing the comparison :) I'll leave some info about why this repro needs a macro.

Fixes rust-lang#140259

r? `@nnethercote`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

name of non-Rpitit assoc item error
4 participants