-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ESA Active Layer Thickness #48
Comments
Evaluating permafrost physics in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) models and their sensitivity to climate change |
Analysis of Permafrost Thermal Dynamics and Response to Climate Change in the CMIP5 Earth System Models |
|
Nice work. I'd like to talk through these results at some point. I want
to make sure that everything is being compared correctly. And, I'm looking
at the data and some of it doesn't make sense. The low ALT values in the
ESACCI dataset in the southern domains for example, must mean something
other than low ALT. Also, and to this end, can you run the ESACCI dataset
as another model against the CALM network to get a sense of how much
agreement there is or isn't between these two datasets?
…On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 9:00 AM nocollier ***@***.***> wrote:
- Implemented
<https://github.com/rubisco-sfa/ILAMB/blob/nate/alt/src/ILAMB/ConfALT.py>
effective snow depth, seasonal and thermal offsets, mean annual ground
temperature, mean annual ground surface temperature, mean annual air
temperature, active layer thickness, and thawed fraction used in the papers
above.
- I used the permafrost extent to mask out active layer thickness
which has produced easier to read maps
<https://www.ilamb.org/dev/HighLat/>
- I also have included a score for the fraction of the CALM sites
where permafrost was observed in the models as well as a modeled depth.
- Much of the Burke paper is about relationships which I am trying to
include. This requires encoding some snow depth data
<https://nsidc.org/data/nsidc-0447/versions/1>. The monthly data is in
ascii format and so conversion is taking some time.
- Still need to look rather (or additionally) at comparing a log
transform of ALT
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#48 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFABYVDZCUU5LHWPUBRIJSDXZCF2XANCNFSM6AAAAAA22GM6ZA>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
I have tried to be careful about implementing what the papers say they are doing but it is easy to make a mistake. Perhaps some time when we can review the code would be a good idea. I will add ESACCI as a model in the next run, but for now consider these comparison plots of ESA to CALM. Note though that this is using my coarsened ESA dataset. |
As mentioned on our last dev call, here is the data reference. @dlawrenncar @ckoven
https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/67a3f8c8dc914ef99f7f08eb0d997e23
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: