Skip to content

Improve Range/.range & iteration generally #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
rdaum opened this issue Jun 28, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Improve Range/.range & iteration generally #2

rdaum opened this issue Jun 28, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@rdaum
Copy link
Owner

rdaum commented Jun 28, 2023

Problems with the current range & iteration implementation:

  • Not currently performance tested / benched.
  • Not currently in the fuzz tests.
  • Copies: In order to return full keys (for the first half of the entry tuple), the entire key needs to be reconstructed from the partial, which means performing (likely slow) copies during iteration.
  • Missing separate iteration of values and keys. Having .values iteration would take no copies.
  • Source code could be cleaned up.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@rdaum