Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Site doesn't build with Doyxgen 1.9.8 #3288

Closed
aallan opened this issue Nov 20, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3293
Closed

Site doesn't build with Doyxgen 1.9.8 #3288

aallan opened this issue Nov 20, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3293
Assignees
Labels
bug linked pull request Has a linked Pull Request that will close the issue. toolchain This is an infrastructure/toolchain issue

Comments

@aallan
Copy link
Contributor

aallan commented Nov 20, 2023

Need to investigate why the site doesn't build with Doxygen 1.9.8.

@aallan aallan added bug toolchain This is an infrastructure/toolchain issue labels Nov 20, 2023
@aallan aallan linked a pull request Nov 20, 2023 that will close this issue
@aallan aallan added the linked pull request Has a linked Pull Request that will close the issue. label Nov 20, 2023
@aallan
Copy link
Contributor Author

aallan commented Nov 20, 2023

Linking #3283 which is the branch we'll be using to look at this one!

@nelliemckesson
Copy link
Contributor

I'm pretty sure it's because of the file names doxygen is using for 1.9.8 -- the toolchain relies on a file called modules.html which lists all the files in the build. It looks like this file has been renamed files.html. I need to see if files.html exactly matches the former modules.html and if we can get the site to build by just adding that file name as an option, or if more is required.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug linked pull request Has a linked Pull Request that will close the issue. toolchain This is an infrastructure/toolchain issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants