New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

the discriminator loss is not as usual #2

Open

howardgriffin opened this issue Feb 20, 2019 · 0 comments

howardgriffin commented Feb 20, 2019

It seems that your code recognizes the 'real samples' as 0 and the 'fake samples' as 1,which is not as usual. Does it make sense?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment