-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Duplex connection support via r2pipe. #21
Comments
????
… On 20 Jun 2017, at 01:43, Anton Kochkov ***@***.***> wrote:
To be able to get events from radare2 as well.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
Theres no such thiny in r2pipe. So it doesnt belongs to the rust module
… On 20 Jun 2017, at 01:43, Anton Kochkov ***@***.***> wrote:
To be able to get events from radare2 as well.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
AFAIR there were plans for r2pipe for double-way communication, which is important for radeco and related projects, imho. |
Yes but it has not been designed or implemwnted yet. So it doesnt belongs to the rust repo
… On 20 Jun 2017, at 07:05, Anton Kochkov ***@***.***> wrote:
AFAIR there were plans for r2pipe for double-way communication, which is important for radeco and related projects, imho.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
@radare do you want to design a singular duplex model which would then be implemented for all pipes? |
i would prefer to reuse the same channel but dont wanna break current r2pipe, and i dont think this is possible, in fact that stream should be about capturing stderr, anything else? maybe we can add a separate pipe.. but optional to not break compat
… On 23 Jun 2017, at 12:44, Chinmay Deshpande ***@***.***> wrote:
@radare <https://github.com/radare> do you want to design a singular duplex model which would then be implemented for all pipes?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#21 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA3-lgLYggpKE7kGsIiESRRMTLn0CZOhks5sG5cNgaJpZM4N_Jgt>.
|
This was referenced Sep 15, 2018
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
To be able to get events from radare2 as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: