You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We can see that the entire greengas input slot is set to 0.0% after the netting of the circularity shares, while the share of the transformation node is only 0.72%.
This leads to bugs in the calculations of the recursive factors. For instance, the sustainability share of the greengas node now becomes zero, while this should per definition be set to 1, since greengas is a sustainable carrier.
This in turn leads to errors in model calculations.
Is it possible that we change the placement of the netting to the input shares instead of the input slots @noracato ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The input slots, instead of share are recalculated in the circularity shares. For example in this scenario: https://energytransitionmodel.com/saved_scenarios/18524:
We can see that the entire greengas input slot is set to 0.0% after the netting of the circularity shares, while the share of the transformation node is only 0.72%.
This leads to bugs in the calculations of the recursive factors. For instance, the sustainability share of the greengas node now becomes zero, while this should per definition be set to 1, since greengas is a sustainable carrier.
This in turn leads to errors in model calculations.
Is it possible that we change the placement of the netting to the input shares instead of the input slots @noracato ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: