From 3f92dbd25be8e33802de01346014ce641289a420 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: amyheather Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 10:19:59 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Built site for gh-pages --- .nojekyll | 2 +- evaluation/badges.html | 4 ++-- evaluation/reproduction_report.html | 14 ++++++------ evaluation/reproduction_success.html | 16 +++++++------- evaluation/scope.html | 16 +++++++------- listings.json | 2 +- logbook/logbook.html | 32 ++++++++++++++-------------- logbook/posts/2024_07_03/index.html | 2 +- logbook/posts/2024_07_04/index.html | 2 +- logbook/posts/2024_07_05/index.html | 2 +- logbook/posts/2024_07_08/index.html | 4 ++-- logbook/posts/2024_07_09/index.html | 6 +++--- logbook/posts/2024_07_11/index.html | 2 +- logbook/posts/2024_07_12/index.html | 4 ++-- logbook/posts/2024_07_15/index.html | 2 +- logbook/posts/2024_11_21/index.html | 4 ++-- search.json | 2 +- sitemap.xml | 2 +- 18 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-) diff --git a/.nojekyll b/.nojekyll index c219112..6a24aa1 100644 --- a/.nojekyll +++ b/.nojekyll @@ -1 +1 @@ -afbefdf0 \ No newline at end of file +d77e4b27 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/evaluation/badges.html b/evaluation/badges.html index 236d9f6..cec47d3 100644 --- a/evaluation/badges.html +++ b/evaluation/badges.html @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@

Journal badges

Caveat: Please note that these criteria are based on available information about each badge online. Moreover, we focus only on reproduction of the discrete-event simulation, and not on other aspects of the article. We cannot guarantee that the badges below would have been awarded in practice by these journals.

Criteria

-
+
Code
from IPython.display import display, Markdown
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ 

Criteria

Badges

-
+
Code
# Full badge names
diff --git a/evaluation/reproduction_report.html b/evaluation/reproduction_report.html
index b1f4f73..dd023db 100644
--- a/evaluation/reproduction_report.html
+++ b/evaluation/reproduction_report.html
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ 

Computationa

Consensus: Successfully reproduced

“Exclusive-Use Scenario. In this scenario, the overall wait time probability at angioINR was reduced compared to baseline (red line in Figure 2B compared to Figure 2A). This represents a decrease in ECR patient wait time for angioINR by an average of 6 min.” Huang et al. (2019)

Reproduction:

-
+
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@

Computationa

Consensus: Successfully reproduced

“Two angioINRs Scenario. This scenario simulates the effect a facility upgrade to two biplane angiographic suites, but without additional staff changes. The wait time probability at angioINR was reduced compared to baseline (Figure 2C). The reduction represents an average of 4 min less in queue for angioINR.” Huang et al. (2019)

Reproduction:

-
+
@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@

Computationa

Consensus: Not reproduced

“Extended Schedule Scenario. The wait time probability at angioINR in the exclusive- use scenario was further reduced by extended work hours (Figure 3B). In contrast, work extension did not affect baseline or the 2 angioINRs scenario (Figures 3A,C). For the baseline scenario, 1 and 2 h of extra work resulted in an average wait time of 1.7 and 0.9 min reduction, respectively. For the 2 angioINRs scenario, 1 and 2 h of extra work resulted in an average wait time gain of 1 and 0.3 min, respectively.” Huang et al. (2019)

Reproduction:

-
+
@@ -449,11 +449,11 @@

Computationa

Evaluation against guidelines

-
+
-