Updated SplitImage branch

[breezewish]

Merged master branch to SplitImage branch. #189

[breezewish]

Oh, just had dinner with friends and it's late :-(
Might be duplicate with #197

[smcgregor]

They are duplicates. Do you see any advantage to working from your PR, or should I just look at the first one to climb the hill?

[breezewish]

Well, I just compared two branches.

• build.py
  My commit doesn't make changes to build.py compared to current master branch (and everything builds well). Update split image branch to include latest commits #197 contains several outdated config entries which I think isn't necessary and might break it.
• base64.js, rawdeflate.js, rawinflate.js, zerobin.js
  I moved these four files to /shared/ZeroBin to share with both SplitImage and Message. Update split image branch to include latest commits #197 keeps two copies: /shared/ZeroBin and /Message/js.
• shared/test/privly-web/new.js
  I didn't apply any changes to this file (I think it is unrelated to SplitImage after a quick review). Update split image branch to include latest commits #197 merges it. BTW Update split image branch to include latest commits #197 has some unsolved merge conflicts.
• zerobin.js
  I used latest zerobin.js (which is located in Message/js directory) in shared/ZeroBin. Update split image branch to include latest commits #197 uses a former version here.
• ZeroBin/*
  I didn't apply changes to files in this directory since it is deprecated. Update split image branch to include latest commits #197 applies.

Other differences are mainly caused by build.py: I ran build.py to rebuild all templates, which inserts SplitImage entry to navigation bar, and makes some other changes like this commit.

However I made a mistake here :-( my SplitImage branch is based on my previous work, which should not be included in this branch. I will fix it later.

Currently my branch builds well and passes all tests :-)

[smcgregor]

Thanks for the summary.

It would be better to leave base64.js, rawdeflate.js, rawinflate.js, and zerobin.js in the Message directory for the time being. We have modified them, but they are not our libraries so they don't exactly fit in either the vendor or the shared directories. Let's just reference them across apps for the time being. This isn't good style, but I would like to evaluate the more recent options for JS compression before we adopt them as the recommended standard -- particularly for SplitImage.

[smcgregor]

Closed for #201

Thanks for addressing the comments, but these became very difficult to review.