From d462b4a39d0ea452aecbcb212d11f8b4c2ff6628 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alessio Parma Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 09:24:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] updated readme links --- README.md | 25 +++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 1b5fe1b..d53d73a 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -8,14 +8,15 @@ A generic, concurrent, portable and flexible Object Pool for the .NET Framework, * Latest release version: `v3.0.3` * Build status on [AppVeyor](https://ci.appveyor.com): [![Build status](https://ci.appveyor.com/api/projects/status/r4qnqaqj9ri6cicn?svg=true)](https://ci.appveyor.com/project/pomma89/objectpool) * [Doxygen](http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/index.html) documentation: - + [HTML](https://goo.gl/RVA7mV) - + [PDF](https://goo.gl/U6dNkt) + + [HTML](http://pomma89.altervista.org/objectpool/doc/html/index.html) + + [CHM](http://pomma89.altervista.org/objectpool/doc/refman.chm) + + [PDF](http://pomma89.altervista.org/objectpool/doc/refman.pdf) * [NuGet](https://www.nuget.org) package(s): + [CodeProject.ObjectPool](https://nuget.org/packages/CodeProject.ObjectPool/) ## Introduction ## -Library is production ready and it is successfully working in real life systems. [Here](https://4538d366a46bbb00d202aaaa7b99c4e50320a061.googledrive.com/host/0B8v0ikF4z2BiR29YQmxfSlE1Sms/Progetti/ObjectPool/doc/index.html) you can find the Doxygen-generated API documentation. +Library is production ready and it is successfully working in real life systems. Original source code has been modified, in order to introduce a Parameterized Object Pool, already drafted by Ofir Makmal in the comments of the article. Moreover, a few unit tests have been added, in order to improve code reliability, and a lot of other small changes have also been applied. @@ -127,14 +128,14 @@ internal sealed class ExternalExpensiveResource ## Benchmarks ## -All benchmarks were implemented and run using the wonderful [BenchmarkDotNet](https://github.com/PerfDotNet/BenchmarkDotNet) library. +All benchmarks were implemented and run using the wonderful [BenchmarkDotNet](https://github.com/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet) library. -### [Retrieve one object](https://github.com/pomma89/ObjectPool/blob/master/ObjectPool.Benchmarks/RetrieveOneObject.cs) ### +### [Retrieve one object](https://github.com/pomma89/ObjectPool/blob/master/test/CodeProject.ObjectPool.Benchmarks/RetrieveOneObject.cs) ### In this benchmark we evaluate how long it takes to extract and return an object stored into the pool, using a single thread. We compare four implementations: -* [This project's ObjectPool](https://github.com/pomma89/ObjectPool/blob/master/ObjectPool/ObjectPool.cs) -* [This project's ParameterizedObjectPool](https://github.com/pomma89/ObjectPool/blob/master/ObjectPool/ParameterizedObjectPool.cs) +* [This project's ObjectPool](https://github.com/pomma89/ObjectPool/blob/master/src/CodeProject.ObjectPool/ObjectPool.cs) +* [This project's ParameterizedObjectPool](https://github.com/pomma89/ObjectPool/blob/master/src/CodeProject.ObjectPool/ParameterizedObjectPool.cs) * [Microsoft's ObjectPool](http://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.Extensions.ObjectPool/) * [Original ObjectPool](http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/535735/Implementing-a-Generic-Object-Pool-in-NET) @@ -156,12 +157,12 @@ Job=RyuJitX64 Jit=RyuJit Platform=X64 | MicrosoftObjectPool | 59.3673 ns | 1.2349 ns | - | 0 B | | OriginalObjectPool | 1,773.9186 ns | 96.7615 ns | 0.0238 | 240 B | -### [Retrieve objects concurrently](https://github.com/pomma89/ObjectPool/blob/master/ObjectPool.Benchmarks/RetrieveObjectsConcurrently.cs) ### +### [Retrieve objects concurrently](https://github.com/pomma89/ObjectPool/blob/master/test/CodeProject.ObjectPool.Benchmarks/RetrieveObjectsConcurrently.cs) ### In this benchmark we evaluate how long it takes to extract and return an object stored into the pool, using `Count` threads. We compare four implementations: -* [This project's ObjectPool](https://github.com/pomma89/ObjectPool/blob/master/ObjectPool/ObjectPool.cs) -* [This project's ParameterizedObjectPool](https://github.com/pomma89/ObjectPool/blob/master/ObjectPool/ParameterizedObjectPool.cs) +* [This project's ObjectPool](https://github.com/pomma89/ObjectPool/blob/master/src/CodeProject.ObjectPool/ObjectPool.cs) +* [This project's ParameterizedObjectPool](https://github.com/pomma89/ObjectPool/blob/master/src/CodeProject.ObjectPool/ParameterizedObjectPool.cs) * [Microsoft's ObjectPool](http://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.Extensions.ObjectPool/) * [Original ObjectPool](http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/535735/Implementing-a-Generic-Object-Pool-in-NET) @@ -192,11 +193,11 @@ Job=RyuJitX64 Jit=RyuJit Platform=X64 | OriginalObjectPool | 1000 | 1,458.5456 us | 25.8381 us | 29.1667 | - | 268.99 kB | -### [Memory stream pooling](https://github.com/pomma89/ObjectPool/blob/master/ObjectPool.Benchmarks/MemoryStreamPooling.cs) ### +### [Memory stream pooling](https://github.com/pomma89/ObjectPool/blob/master/test/CodeProject.ObjectPool.Benchmarks/MemoryStreamPooling.cs) ### In this benchmark we evaluate how long it takes to extract and return a memory stream stored into the pool, using a single thread. We compare two implementations: -* [This project's MemoryStreamPool](https://github.com/pomma89/ObjectPool/blob/master/ObjectPool/Specialized/MemoryStreamPool.cs) +* [This project's MemoryStreamPool](https://github.com/pomma89/ObjectPool/blob/master/src/CodeProject.ObjectPool/Specialized/MemoryStreamPool.cs) * [Microsoft's RecyclableMemoryStreamManager](http://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.IO.RecyclableMemoryStream/) ``` ini