Implement bridge-device functionality for onboarding non-OCF compliant devices

[jkralik]

Implement a bridge-device service facilitating access to bridged devices, incorporating extensions beyond the OCF specification for local access. Notable distinctions include the use of a single opened UDP (potentially DTLS in the future) for Plgd bridged devices, contrasting with OCF bridged devices that utilize individual UDP/DTLS/TCP/TCP-TLS for both IPv4 and IPv6.

Key Points:

• Access devices by including the query parameter di=<deviceID> in the request.
• The discovery resource (/oic/res) without the di parameter provides links for all devices. Each link contains a deviceID, specifying the required value for the di query parameter.
• Accessing another device without the di parameter results in failure.

Features:

• Enables setting a Certificate Authority (CA) for cloud connection for each bridged device.
• Implements a cloud connector for each bridged device with certificate validation for cloud connections.
• Supports custom loggers.
• Provides an API for configuring update/get/observe handlers for resources.
• Supports both IPv4 and IPv6.

To Be Implemented:

• Deployment of a DTLS server with a shared certificate and pre-shared key for all devices.
• Introduction of Access Control Lists (ACLs) for each bridged device.
• Integration of ownership and provision states.
• Implementation of a Certificate Signing Request (CSR) resource and identity certificate for each bridged device.
• Incorporation of additional OCF-related functionalities.

NOTE

The bridge-device is compatible with client-application 0.10.0 or later.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: 725 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (e22e783) 70.47% compared to head (221b966) 71.77%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
bridge/net/network.go	79.62%	30 Missing and 24 partials ⚠️
test/coap-gateway/service/service.go	57.81%	40 Missing and 14 partials ⚠️
bridge/service/service.go	56.14%	40 Missing and 10 partials ⚠️
bridge/resources/resource.go	73.88%	34 Missing and 13 partials ⚠️
test/client/client.go	60.34%	36 Missing and 10 partials ⚠️
test/coap-gateway/service/resourceDirectory.go	30.15%	41 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
test/coap-gateway/defaultHandler.go	65.85%	42 Missing ⚠️
bridge/device/cloud/manager.go	85.81%	26 Missing and 13 partials ⚠️
client/options.go	10.81%	33 Missing ⚠️
test/coap-gateway/service/signIn.go	28.20%	24 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
... and 35 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #420      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   70.47%   71.77%   +1.30%     
==========================================
  Files          80      124      +44     
  Lines        4576     7101    +2525     
==========================================
+ Hits         3225     5097    +1872     
- Misses        935     1434     +499     
- Partials      416      570     +154     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Danielius1922]

• wait for Add support for testing of a bridged device hub#1202 to be updated, then we can merge

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
85.6% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[Danielius1922]

TODO: update to vnext after