Inverted Provider Access in SparseTrie and necessary refactoring/modifications

[PoulavBhowmick03]

Potentially fixes #14646

• I am not sure if this was asked to be done or the work required to close this issue. I have inverted the provider access in the SparseTrie and the RevealedSparseTrie and have made the necessary changes by adding a generic and argument for the provider to the functions update_leaf and remove_leaf
• I have also updated the tests to take in this additional parameter

There is one issue, in crates/trie/trie/src/witness.rs

reth/crates/trie/trie/src/witness.rs

Lines 140 to 148 in f0c9ca6

	if let Some(value) = maybe_leaf_value {
	storage_trie.update_leaf(storage_nibbles, value).map_err(|err| {
	SparseStateTrieErrorKind::SparseStorageTrie(hashed_address, err.into_kind())
	})?;
	} else {
	storage_trie.remove_leaf(&storage_nibbles).map_err(|err| {
	SparseStateTrieErrorKind::SparseStorageTrie(hashed_address, err.into_kind())
	})?;
	}

I need to add another parameter for the new argument passed in these two functions. What should they be?

[PoulavBhowmick03]

@Rjected @mattsse Can you PTAL, and let me know if I am on the right tracks, and what should be added to the witness.rs and for any other changes