Update baseline.yaml - NEW - OSPS-DO-19 #122
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
suggestion for new lvl 3 criteria for external audit/risk assessment Signed-off-by: CRob <69357996+SecurityCRob@users.noreply.github.com>
SecurityCRob
requested review from
funnelfiasco,
eddie-knight and
puerco
and removed request for
funnelfiasco and
eddie-knight
|
happy to see this added... but.... do we need to list it specifically by major version release? or every two versions? if it happened in v1.0 and the project is now on 4, does it still count? |
|
@TheFoxAtWork I agree, alternatively after a time period for projects that don't cut major releases. |
Co-authored-by: Evan Anderson <evan.k.anderson@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: CRob <69357996+SecurityCRob@users.noreply.github.com>
SecurityCRob
added
documentation
funnelfiasco
requested changes
Dec 19, 2024
Co-authored-by: Ben Cotton <bcotton@funnelfiasco.com> Signed-off-by: CRob <69357996+SecurityCRob@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Evan Anderson <evan.k.anderson@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: CRob <69357996+SecurityCRob@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ben Cotton <bcotton@funnelfiasco.com> Signed-off-by: CRob <69357996+SecurityCRob@users.noreply.github.com>
funnelfiasco
requested changes
Dec 19, 2024
fixed weird crob-indent Signed-off-by: CRob <69357996+SecurityCRob@users.noreply.github.com>
| software, and make plans to address those | ||
| problems. The project must | ||
| provide evidence on request. | ||
| implementation: | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| implementation: | | |
| implementation: | | |
| Identify who might be able to pay for an external security audit (including major users, | |
| government programs, and non-profits). | |
| Engage with an external security audit firm to review the project. | |
| implementation: | |
|
I'm a fan of security reviews of OSS projects (I've overseen OSTIF work on many), but the big problem here is funding. It's incredibly hard to get funding for security reviews of OSS projects. Maybe we need a level 4? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
suggestion for new lvl 3 criteria for external audit/risk assessment