-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 278
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ci(e2e): fix e2e all-test action error #2738
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Playwright configuration file, specifically adjusting the Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
WalkthroughThis pull request addresses an error in the end-to-end (e2e) testing configuration by modifying the Changes
|
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ const Config = ({ testDir, baseURL, storageState, devServerCommon }) => | |||
: { | |||
command: devServerCommon, | |||
url: baseURL, | |||
reuseExistingServer: !process.env.CI, | |||
reuseExistingServer: !!process.env.CI, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The change from !process.env.CI
to !!process.env.CI
alters the logic to reuse the existing server only when the CI environment variable is truthy. This is a critical fix for ensuring correct behavior in CI environments.
[e2e-test-warn] The title of the Pull request should look like "fix(vue-renderless): [action-menu, alert] fix xxx bug". Please make sure you've read our contributing guide |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ const Config = ({ testDir, baseURL, storageState, devServerCommon }) => | |||
: { | |||
command: devServerCommon, | |||
url: baseURL, | |||
reuseExistingServer: !process.env.CI, | |||
reuseExistingServer: !!process.env.CI, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
The review comment's suggestion is valid and should be implemented
Looking at the codebase, the CI
environment variable is used in multiple places within the Playwright configuration, and there's even a comment indicating the expected value: // process.env.CI = 'true'
. The current usage of !!process.env.CI
could lead to unexpected behavior as it would treat any non-empty string as true. Since other parts of the configuration also rely on this environment variable for critical test behaviors (retries, workers, headless mode), it's important to be explicit about the expected value.
Key impacts found in the codebase:
- Used for controlling test retries:
retries: process.env.CI ? 2 : 0
- Controls parallel test execution:
workers: process.env.CI ? 1 : 2
- Determines headless mode:
headless: !!process.env.CI
- Affects web server configuration:
reuseExistingServer: !!process.env.CI
The suggested change to process.env.CI === 'true'
would make the behavior more predictable and consistent with the documented expectation in the code comment.
🔗 Analysis chain
Ensure correct boolean interpretation of the CI
environment variable.
Currently, !!process.env.CI
will evaluate to true
if CI
is set to any non-empty string (e.g., 'true'
, 'false'
, '0'
, etc.). If you only want reuseExistingServer
to be true
when CI === 'true'
, consider parsing the string more explicitly:
- reuseExistingServer: !!process.env.CI,
+ reuseExistingServer: process.env.CI === 'true',
Let me verify how the CI
environment variable is being used in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of process.env.CI in the codebase
rg "process\.env\.CI" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 2212
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any configuration or documentation related to CI environment variable
fd "CI" --type f --exec grep -l "CI" {} \;
Length of output: 43
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for any tests or configuration files that might set or use CI environment variable
rg "CI.*=.*['\"](true|false)" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 423
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit