-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 112
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
polarion: update the usage of cifmw_polarion_update_testcases #1804
polarion: update the usage of cifmw_polarion_update_testcases #1804
Conversation
cifmw_polarion_update_testcases is named after a parameter of a tool and it doesn't match its behavior: it is about adding missing test cases when they don't exist. But the "normal" workflow is to pre-populate the test cases and only update (for real) their results, so that variable should almost never be enabled. Also, remove the check about the variable being enabled, as its only usage is guarded by a default() filter.
Thanks for the PR! ❤️ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
Internally tested, nothing seems to explode, move to "ready for review" |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: pablintino The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
aa122a3
into
openstack-k8s-operators:main
cifmw_polarion_update_testcases is named after a parameter of a tool and it doesn't match its behavior: it is about adding missing test cases when they don't exist. But the "normal" workflow is to pre-populate the test cases and only update (for real) their results, so that variable should almost never be enabled.
Also, remove the check about the variable being enabled, as its only usage is guarded by a default() filter.
As a pull request owner and reviewers, I checked that: