Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

polarion: update the usage of cifmw_polarion_update_testcases #1804

Merged

Conversation

tosky
Copy link
Contributor

@tosky tosky commented May 31, 2024

cifmw_polarion_update_testcases is named after a parameter of a tool and it doesn't match its behavior: it is about adding missing test cases when they don't exist. But the "normal" workflow is to pre-populate the test cases and only update (for real) their results, so that variable should almost never be enabled.

Also, remove the check about the variable being enabled, as its only usage is guarded by a default() filter.

As a pull request owner and reviewers, I checked that:

  • Appropriate testing is done and actually running
  • Appropriate documentation exists and/or is up-to-date:
    • README in the role
    • Content of the docs/source is reflecting the changes

cifmw_polarion_update_testcases is named after a parameter of a tool
and it doesn't match its behavior: it is about adding missing test cases
when they don't exist. But the "normal" workflow is to pre-populate
the test cases and only update (for real) their results,
so that variable should almost never be enabled.

Also, remove the check about the variable being enabled,
as its only usage is guarded by a default() filter.
@github-actions github-actions bot marked this pull request as draft May 31, 2024 13:59
Copy link

Thanks for the PR! ❤️
I'm marking it as a draft, once your happy with it merging and the PR is passing CI, click the "Ready for review" button below.

Copy link
Contributor

@kopecmartin kopecmartin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@tosky
Copy link
Contributor Author

tosky commented Jun 5, 2024

Internally tested, nothing seems to explode, move to "ready for review"

@tosky tosky marked this pull request as ready for review June 5, 2024 10:36
@pablintino
Copy link
Collaborator

/approve

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 5, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pablintino

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label Jun 5, 2024
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit aa122a3 into openstack-k8s-operators:main Jun 5, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants