-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 112
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[networking_mapper] Switch to best effort strategy #1692
Conversation
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
20f1638
to
f6664d1
Compare
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/buildset/8eca50a395784809ab79b46527d2081c ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 1h 34m 19s |
5755af3
to
3ca980f
Compare
Merge Failed. This change or one of its cross-repo dependencies was unable to be automatically merged with the current state of its repository. Please rebase the change and upload a new patchset. |
3ca980f
to
0e7c1f8
Compare
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/buildset/4b903599a102434a9615a63e3abbeb10 ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 1h 38m 09s |
cf81e07
to
6aef8ed
Compare
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/buildset/20806dc74a7748bc8fb181dfa0cdaab8 ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 1h 50m 16s |
6aef8ed
to
b8776f7
Compare
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/buildset/f837d5c6d3ad4a0ba3657633a3423161 ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 2h 06m 24s |
07f0fcf
to
1093909
Compare
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/buildset/3a92013e3e5c489e8470fbfe6dc045e5 ❌ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider FAILURE in 18m 35s |
3cbbe10
to
6694bd2
Compare
25c25b5
to
13451ac
Compare
I could test this PR in #1767 successfully - could get all the needed data to fix VM IPs beforehand! |
/approve (since I could successfully test it - I'll let @pablintino toggle the hold and related things + ask reviews from others) |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cjeanner The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/buildset/a20621886fa7400cb63f2c6730041e95 ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 1h 43m 31s |
13451ac
to
7dd0986
Compare
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/buildset/f87ae5f8bccf45fbaecd7046bb422700 ❌ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider FAILURE in 9m 48s |
recheck |
7dd0986
to
987b989
Compare
987b989
to
b86a098
Compare
With the introduction of IPv6 the mapper now needs to perform partial maps with hosts in the inventory that are not yet reachable, so it needs to be able to perform the mapping without a full set of ansible facts. The strategy that the PR follows is the next one: - Despite the type of mapping, full or partial, do a best effort approach without failing if a fact is missing. - In partial maps, allow the mapper to take the interfaces-info - Avoid refreshing networking facts for those hosts that has not ansible_host fact present, assuming those are not reachable.
b86a098
to
a003bad
Compare
Unit tested with
|
With the introduction of IPv6 the mapper now needs to perform partial maps with hosts in the inventory that are not yet reachable, so it needs to be able to perform the mapping without a full set of ansible facts.
The strategy that the PR follows is the next one:
As a pull request owner and reviewers, I checked that: