Parameter compliant in SDMXREST21RequestBuilder #217
-
I want to create/add a SDMX service provider in the following way: library(rsdmx)
BANREP <- SDMXServiceProvider(agencyId = "BANREP", name = "Banco de la República",
scale = "national",
country = "COL",
builder = SDMXREST21RequestBuilder(regUrl = "https://totoro.banrep.gov.co/nsi-jax-ws/rest",
repoUrl = "https://totoro.banrep.gov.co/nsi-jax-ws/rest",
compliant = TRUE,
unsupportedResources = list("metadatastructure",
"hierarchicalcodelist",
"organisationscheme",
"agencyscheme",
"dataproviderscheme",
"dataconsumerscheme",
"organisationunitscheme",
"metadataflow",
"reportingtaxonomy",
"provisionagreement",
"structureset",
"process",
"contentconstraint",
"attachmentconstraint",
"actualconstraint",
"allowedconstraint",
"structure",
"transformationscheme",
"rulesetscheme",
"userdefinedoperatorscheme",
"customtypescheme",
"namepersonalisationscheme",
"vtlmappingscheme",
"metadata"))) But I really don't understant the Reading the documentation of the API it mentions that "This web service, which uses the SDMX standard, is currently configured with the SDMX-ML Generic Data structure version 2.1 ...". Also I know that the following resources are implemented based on what is pointed out in https://github.com/sdmx-twg/sdmx-rest/tree/v1.5.0 and when exploring the API:
Is there a test or additional information do I need to provide to know if the web-service is compliant with the SDMX REST web-service specifications or the only way is to contact |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
Hi @luifrancgom the If you want, we can add your service provider as part of the embedded sdmx service endpoints in rsdmx. You can contribute it in case you want to do it, please open an issue on it, and send me a pull request. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hi @luifrancgom the
compliant
is more an indicator I've added, because of the service providers i've plugged in rsdmx were supposed to implement SDMX 2.1 service specification, and then realized that they were not fully compliant, and I wanted to add some note on this. You should not worry much about this parameter.If you want, we can add your service provider as part of the embedded sdmx service endpoints in rsdmx. You can contribute it in case you want to do it, please open an issue on it, and send me a pull request.