You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There has been feedback from EUDIW that having a small list of MTI (mandatory to implement) crypto suites for multiple things would greatly help for interoperability. Below is probably a least controversial list..?
For encryption, it might make sense to mandate support for AES-128-GCM as well. Same Security Strength as ECDSA + P256 and most references I've seen in the past mandate support for AES-128-GCM and recommend AES-256-GCM (e.g., TLS 1.3 https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8446.html#section-9.1).
There has been feedback from EUDIW that having a small list of MTI (mandatory to implement) crypto suites for multiple things would greatly help for interoperability. Below is probably a least controversial list..?
Issuer Signatures:
Key binding/presentation and Verifier Signatures:
Encryption (if needed):
Hashing:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: