Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove bok-choy usage #4093

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

salman2013
Copy link
Contributor

@salman2013 salman2013 commented Jan 9, 2024

#Description

As the bok-choy has been deprecated openedx/public-engineering#13, we are removing its usage from the code in this PR.

Ticket: https://github.com/orgs/openedx/projects/55/views/1?pane=issue&itemId=49965514

@salman2013 salman2013 changed the title chore: remove bok-choy Remove bok-choy usage Jan 15, 2024
@salman2013 salman2013 marked this pull request as ready for review January 15, 2024 08:05
@salman2013 salman2013 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 15, 2024 08:05
@salman2013 salman2013 self-assigned this Jan 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like you got it working by moving this whole file over, do we need the whole file or are you planning on removing everything that you don't need now that you've got the tests passing?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@feanil Yes i have looked into few methods which are not required so i am going to remove them in the coming commits, The purpose of tagging was a preliminary review if this strategy looks fine? I have tried so many things with the selenium browser but the test was not passing due to some webdriver conflicts.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yea, I think you're going in the right direction, let me know when this is ready for another round of review. Hopefully we can drop most of the copied file but I'm okay with leaving it in if necessary.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@salman2013 salman2013 Jan 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@feanil It's ready for another round, i removed a few of the methods but some need to be there.

@feanil
Copy link
Contributor

feanil commented Jan 18, 2024

@salman2013 there are some conflicts on this branch, can you rebase and resolve them. I think after that, this is good to merge.

@salman2013
Copy link
Contributor Author

@feanil I have already resolved the conflicts and it seems its good to merge.

@feanil
Copy link
Contributor

feanil commented Jan 18, 2024

It still looks like it can't be merged to me:
image

@salman2013
Copy link
Contributor Author

@feanil could you please look at it again, thanks

@feanil feanil merged commit 7c6877a into openedx:master Jan 19, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants