Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build: prepare for test matrix #176

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 13, 2025
Merged

Conversation

alex-liang3
Copy link
Contributor

@alex-liang3 alex-liang3 commented Jan 7, 2025

Adds a new Makefile directive to be used in CI to facilitate unit testing multiple Python versions. This should be merged BEFORE open-space-collective/open-space-toolkit#144, and will only kick in after the latter is merged.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added a new Makefile target for running Python unit tests in continuous integration (CI) environments.
    • Provides a streamlined method for executing tests within a controlled Docker environment.
  • Changes
    • Updated the GitHub Actions workflow to reference a new version for the packaging step, improving artifact naming conventions.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new target ci-test-python in the Makefile, designed for running Python unit tests in continuous integration environments. This target is marked as .PHONY, indicating it should always execute upon invocation. It sets up a testing environment by running a Docker container based on the development image, installs necessary Python packages from a specified directory, and executes tests using pytest, thereby enhancing the Makefile's testing capabilities. Additionally, the GitHub Actions workflow for packaging has been updated to reference a different branch for artifact naming fixes.

Changes

File Change Summary
Makefile Added new .PHONY target ci-test-python for running Python unit tests in CI environments. Updated method signature to include a description of the target's functionality.
.github/workflows/build-test.yml Updated the uses directive in the package job to reference build-packages.yml@fix/artifact-names instead of build-packages.yml@main.

Possibly related PRs

  • build: update all gh action extensions to latest versions #179: The changes in the .github/workflows/build-test.yml file in this PR involve updates to the workflow that includes the package job, which is also referenced in the main PR's summary. Both PRs modify the same workflow file, indicating a potential relationship in the context of CI processes.

Suggested reviewers

  • vishwa2710

Poem

🐰 In the realm of code, a new test springs to life,
A Makefile target cuts through testing strife.
Docker containers spin, pytest takes flight,
CI pipelines dancing with algorithmic might!
Rabbit's code-craft, precise and clean, 🧪
Ensures our software remains serene. 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e35b36c and c34a266.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/build-test.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/build-test.yml (2)

70-70: Verify the stability of the feature branch.

The workflow reference has been changed from @main to @fix/artifact-names. While this might be necessary for fixing artifact naming issues, using a feature branch instead of the main branch could introduce instability.

Please ensure that:

  1. The fix/artifact-names branch is properly maintained
  2. There's a plan to switch back to @main once the fixes are merged
  3. The branch won't be deleted while this workflow depends on it

Run this script to check the branch status:

✅ Verification successful

Branch verification successful but warrants monitoring.

The fix/artifact-names branch is actively maintained with recent commits specifically addressing artifact naming issues. While the branch choice is justified, consider:

  • Tracking the eventual merge of these fixes into the main branch
  • Planning to update the workflow reference back to @main once merged
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the status and recent activity of the fix/artifact-names branch

# Check if the branch exists and when it was last updated
gh api \
  -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
  repos/open-space-collective/open-space-toolkit/branches/fix/artifact-names

Length of output: 4713


Line range hint 1-70: Missing Makefile changes mentioned in PR objectives.

The PR objectives and AI summary mention introducing a new ci-test-python directive in the Makefile for testing across multiple Python versions. However, these changes are not visible in the provided files.

Please ensure that:

  1. The Makefile changes are included in this PR
  2. The changes align with the PR objectives

Run this script to locate the Makefile changes:


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@alex-liang3 alex-liang3 force-pushed the users/alexliang/test-matrix branch from e63b919 to fb418ec Compare January 9, 2025 13:55
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.31%. Comparing base (575bc75) to head (bcf8cc8).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #176   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.31%   76.31%           
=======================================
  Files          31       31           
  Lines        2613     2613           
=======================================
  Hits         1994     1994           
  Misses        619      619           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@alex-liang3 alex-liang3 force-pushed the users/alexliang/test-matrix branch from fb418ec to 667d7e9 Compare January 10, 2025 13:32
@alex-liang3 alex-liang3 changed the title temp build: prepare for test matrix Jan 10, 2025
@alex-liang3 alex-liang3 self-assigned this Jan 10, 2025
@alex-liang3 alex-liang3 marked this pull request as ready for review January 10, 2025 16:50
@alex-liang3 alex-liang3 force-pushed the users/alexliang/test-matrix branch from 7470358 to 66cc3d4 Compare January 13, 2025 16:43
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Makefile (1)

525-541: Consider integration with test-unit target.

The new ci-test-python target is not included in the main test targets (test, test-unit). Consider whether it should be integrated or kept separate for CI-only use.

Options to consider:

  1. Keep separate (current implementation) - Good for CI-specific flows
  2. Include in test-unit - Better integration but might slow down local development
  3. Add a new composite target for CI - Best of both worlds

If you want to integrate it, here's a suggested approach:

 test-unit: ## Run unit tests
 
 	@ echo "Running unit tests..."
 
 	@ $(MAKE) test-unit-cpp
-	@ $(MAKE) test-unit-python
+	@ if [ "${CI}" = "true" ]; then \
+		$(MAKE) ci-test-python; \
+	else \
+		$(MAKE) test-unit-python; \
+	fi
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 575bc75 and 66cc3d4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Makefile (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: Test / Run C++ Unit Tests
  • GitHub Check: Test / Run Python Unit Tests
  • GitHub Check: Test / Check Python Format
  • GitHub Check: Test / Check C++ Format
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Makefile (2)

525-526: LGTM! Clear and descriptive target documentation.

The comment clearly states the prerequisites (dev image and bindings) needed for this target.


529-538: Verify error handling for missing prerequisites.

The target assumes the development image and Python packages exist but doesn't verify these prerequisites. Consider adding checks to provide helpful error messages if they're missing.

Run this script to check how other targets handle missing prerequisites:

Consider adding error checks:

 ci-test-python: ## Run Python unit tests. Assumes the dev image has already been built, AND that bindings have been built and are available at `packages/python`
+	@ if [ ! -d "packages/python" ]; then \
+		echo "Error: Python packages not found in packages/python. Please build them first."; \
+		exit 1; \
+	fi
 
 	@ echo "Running Python unit tests..."

Makefile Show resolved Hide resolved
@alex-liang3 alex-liang3 force-pushed the users/alexliang/test-matrix branch from 66cc3d4 to e35b36c Compare January 13, 2025 16:46
.github/workflows/build-test.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@vishwa2710 vishwa2710 merged commit 922e392 into main Jan 13, 2025
14 checks passed
@vishwa2710 vishwa2710 deleted the users/alexliang/test-matrix branch January 13, 2025 20:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants