Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[nrf fromlist] boards: nrf54h20dk: Add SUIT storage definition #1718

Conversation

tomchy
Copy link
Contributor

@tomchy tomchy commented May 15, 2024

Upstream PR: zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#72810

Add a definition of SUIT storage, so there will be a common source of the SUIT storage location for both SDFW and scripts generating SUIT storage areas, assigned to local domains.

@NordicBuilder NordicBuilder requested a review from anangl May 15, 2024 14:40
@tomchy tomchy force-pushed the bugfix/suit/NCSDK-NONE_Fix_suit_storage_address branch from a9533c3 to 7fdd23a Compare May 16, 2024 14:32
@tomchy tomchy added this to the ncs-2.7.0 milestone May 21, 2024
@tomchy tomchy force-pushed the bugfix/suit/NCSDK-NONE_Fix_suit_storage_address branch from 7fdd23a to 293dfc2 Compare May 21, 2024 09:12
@tomchy tomchy requested a review from 57300 May 21, 2024 10:08
@tomchy tomchy force-pushed the bugfix/suit/NCSDK-NONE_Fix_suit_storage_address branch from 293dfc2 to 941dde6 Compare May 22, 2024 11:24
Upstream PR: zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#72810

Add a definition of SUIT storage, so there will be a common source of
the SUIT storage location for both SDFW and scripts generating SUIT
storage areas, assigned to local domains.

Signed-off-by: Tomasz Chyrowicz <tomasz.chyrowicz@nordicsemi.no>
@tomchy tomchy force-pushed the bugfix/suit/NCSDK-NONE_Fix_suit_storage_address branch from 941dde6 to 39c624b Compare May 23, 2024 11:15
@nordicjm nordicjm merged commit 41095df into nrfconnect:main May 23, 2024
15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants