Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add GetRate() #4

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 3, 2024
Merged

Add GetRate() #4

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 3, 2024

Conversation

nao1215
Copy link
Owner

@nao1215 nao1215 commented Aug 3, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a new contributor to the project, enhancing visibility and acknowledgment.
    • Introduced a new API endpoint (GET /api/rate/[pair]) for retrieving cryptocurrency rates.
  • Documentation

    • Updated the README.md to reflect the new contributor and the added API endpoint.
    • Enhanced the contributors section with a table layout for better presentation.
  • Tests

    • Introduced a suite of unit tests for the GetRate function to ensure accurate rate retrieval and error handling.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the Coincheck API client by introducing a new contributor and expanding the documentation. A new endpoint for retrieving cryptocurrency rates was added, accompanied by a structured implementation in the codebase. Additionally, comprehensive unit tests were introduced to ensure the robustness of the new functionality. The updates improve both the project's acknowledgment of contributors and its usability.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.all-contributorsrc Added a new contributor entry with details on contributions.
README.md Updated All Contributors badge, added documentation for new API endpoint /api/rate/[pair], and enhanced the contributors' section layout.
rate.go, rate_test.go Introduced rate.go for retrieving standard coin rates with corresponding unit tests in rate_test.go.

Poem

In the garden of code, where bunnies hop free,
New features sprout bright, like leaves on a tree.
Contributors join in with a cheer and a grin,
Together we build, let the coding begin!
So hop on, dear friends, let's code and create,
With all of our efforts, our project is great! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7c8fadc and 50542a3.

Files selected for processing (4)
  • .all-contributorsrc (1 hunks)
  • README.md (3 hunks)
  • rate.go (1 hunks)
  • rate_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (9)
.all-contributorsrc (1)

12-22: LGTM!

The new contributor entry is well-structured and follows the existing format.

rate.go (3)

8-12: LGTM!

The GetRateInput struct is simple and well-defined.


14-18: LGTM!

The GetRateResponse struct is simple and well-defined.


20-43: LGTM!

The GetRate function is well-structured, handles errors appropriately, and the logic is clear and concise.

rate_test.go (3)

14-49: LGTM!

The test case GetStandardRate returns the standard rate is well-structured and covers the expected behavior.


51-64: LGTM!

The test case GetStandardRate returns an error is well-structured and covers the expected behavior.


66-101: LGTM!

The test case If the pair is empty, GetStandardRate returns the btc_jpy rate is well-structured and covers the expected behavior.

README.md (2)

115-134: LGTM! Verify the links and layout.

The new table layout for the contributors' section is visually appealing and functional.

Ensure that the links to the contributor's profile and contributions are correct and functional.

Verification successful

Verified: The contributor's profile and profile picture links in the README.md file are correct and functional.

  • The link to the contributor's profile: https://github.com/nao1215/coincheck/commits?author=nao1215
  • The link to the contributor's profile picture: https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/22737008?v=4?s=70
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the links and layout of the contributors' section.

# Test: Check if the contributor's profile link is correct. Expect: Only occurrences of the correct link.
rg --type markdown -A 5 $'https://github.com/nao1215/coincheck/commits?author=nao1215'

# Test: Check if the contributor's profile picture link is correct. Expect: Only occurrences of the correct link.
rg --type markdown -A 5 $'https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/22737008?v=4?s=70'

Length of output: 173


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the links and layout of the contributors' section.

# Test: Check if the contributor's profile link is correct. Expect: Only occurrences of the correct link.
rg --type markdown 'https://github.com/nao1215/coincheck/commits?author=nao1215'

# Test: Check if the contributor's profile picture link is correct. Expect: Only occurrences of the correct link.
rg --type markdown 'https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/22737008?v=4?s=70'

Length of output: 163


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the links and layout of the contributors' section in README.md.

# Test: Check if the contributor's profile link is correct in README.md. Expect: Only occurrences of the correct link.
rg --type markdown 'https://github.com/nao1215/coincheck/commits?author=nao1215' README.md

# Test: Check if the contributor's profile picture link is correct in README.md. Expect: Only occurrences of the correct link.
rg --type markdown 'https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/22737008?v=4?s=70' README.md

Length of output: 183


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the presence of any links related to the contributor in README.md.

# Test: Check for any links related to the contributor's profile in README.md.
rg --type markdown 'nao1215' README.md

# Test: Check for any links related to the contributor's profile picture in README.md.
rg --type markdown 'avatars.githubusercontent.com' README.md

Length of output: 2303


91-91: LGTM! Verify the implementation of the new API endpoint.

The documentation for the new endpoint GET /api/rate/[pair] is clear and consistent with the other API entries.

Ensure that the implementation of this endpoint is correctly integrated and tested.

Verification successful

Implementation Verified

The GetRate method is implemented in the rate.go file, confirming the new API endpoint GET /api/rate/[pair] as documented in the README.md.

  • rate.go: func (c *Client) GetRate(ctx context.Context, input GetRateInput) (*GetRateResponse, error)
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of the new API endpoint `GET /api/rate/[pair]`.

# Test: Search for the implementation of the `GetRate` method. Expect: Only occurrences of the new method.
rg --type go -A 5 $'func (c *Client) GetRate'

Length of output: 46


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of the new API endpoint `GET /api/rate/[pair]`.

# Test: Search for any method related to getting the rate, including potential variations in naming conventions.
rg --type go -A 5 'func (c *Client) GetRate'
rg --type go -A 5 'func GetRate'
rg --type go -A 5 'func (c *Client) FetchRate'
rg --type go -A 5 'func FetchRate'

Length of output: 167


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the new API endpoint `GET /api/rate/[pair]`.

# Test: Search for the usage of the `/api/rate/[pair]` endpoint in the codebase.
rg '/api/rate/\[pair\]'

Length of output: 208


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of the new API endpoint `GET /api/rate/[pair]` in `rate.go`.

# Test: List all function definitions in the `rate.go` file to find the implementation related to the `/api/rate/[pair]` endpoint.
rg --type go --files-with-matches 'rate.go' | xargs rg --type go 'func '

Length of output: 1779

@nao1215 nao1215 merged commit 3f1b808 into main Aug 3, 2024
17 checks passed
@nao1215 nao1215 deleted the nchika/add-standard-rate branch August 3, 2024 13:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant