You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
[Note: I'm adding the content of my email here for record keeping]
The reason revealer returns a signed MI is because it multiplies the actual MI by the sign of the features’ correlation.
In the code, you will see that cond_mutual_inf has the step (line 202):
CIC <- sign(rho) * sqrt(1 - exp(-2 * CMI))`
And and the mutual_inf_v2 function has the step (line 248)
IC <- sign(rho) * sqrt(1 - exp(-2 * MI))`
Which basically multiplies the MI by the sign of the correlation (rho) between the two variables.
I think we can do the same in our knnmi-based score. In order not to lose efficiency, we could call the cor function on the entire set of features. i.e., when computing the MI between X and all the remaining features, say, REST, do something like
MI <- knnmi(X,REST,Z)
RHO <- cor(X,REST)
SMI <- MI * sign(RHO)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
[Note: I'm adding the content of my email here for record keeping]
The reason revealer returns a signed MI is because it multiplies the actual MI by the sign of the features’ correlation.
In the code, you will see that
cond_mutual_inf
has the step (line 202):And and the
mutual_inf_v2
function has the step (line 248)Which basically multiplies the MI by the sign of the correlation (rho) between the two variables.
I think we can do the same in our knnmi-based score. In order not to lose efficiency, we could call the cor function on the entire set of features. i.e., when computing the MI between X and all the remaining features, say, REST, do something like
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: