We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi,
I'm trying to use the diagparser on a UC20 modem.
I was able to compile it without any issues and now when I am trying to capture the diag messages I am not sure it is working as expected:
./diag_parser -p local_file.pcap -i /dev/ttyUSB0 PARSER_OK Got 4 for 1 4 Got 4 for 1 4 Got 4 for 1 4 Got 4 for 1 4 Got 4 for 1 4 Got 5 for 1 6 Got 276 for 1 548 Got 310 for 1 616 Got 152 for 1 300 Got 383 for 1 762 Got 134 for 1 264 Got 85 for 1 166 Got 84 for 1 164 Got 404 for 1 802 Got 40 for 1 74 Got 44 for 1 82 Got 49 for 1 90 Got 72 for 1 138 Got 56 for 1 106 Got 120 for 1 234 Got 68 for 1 130 Got 132 for 1 258 Got 80 for 1 154 Got 336 for 1 666 Got 100 for 1 194 Got 28 for 1 50 Got 60 for 1 114 Got 20 for 1 34 Got 16 for 1 26 Got 108 for 1 210 Got 48 for 1 90 Got 52 for 1 98 Got 56 for 1 106 Got 32 for 1 58 Got 16 for 1 26 Got 112 for 1 218 Got 5 for 1 6
It seems to write a few things in the pcap file but then nothing else happens even if I am doing actions on the modem.
Is there something I do wrongly ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Alex,
Were you able to find a solution to your problem? I am have the exact same output as you. It is identical.
Thanks!!
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Hi,
I'm trying to use the diagparser on a UC20 modem.
I was able to compile it without any issues and now when I am trying to capture the diag messages I am not sure it is working as expected:
It seems to write a few things in the pcap file but then nothing else happens even if I am doing actions on the modem.
Is there something I do wrongly ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: