Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Custom component Input and output properties should be better differentiated #89

Open
gregli-msft opened this issue Dec 17, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@gregli-msft
Copy link
Collaborator

In the bleow, CustomProperty1 is an Input property and CustomProperty2 is an Output property. Yet they show up the same way, which is very confusing.

Component1 As CanvasComponent:
  CustomProperty1: ="Text, Modified"
  CustomProperty2: ="Text, Modified"

It should be something closer to:

Component1 As CanvasComponent:
    CustomProperty1:
        InputDefault: ="Text, Modified"
    CustomProperty2: ="Text, Modified"

In the future, we may be supporting separated Input and Output properties:

Component1 As CanvasComponent:
    CustomProperty3:
        InputDefault: ="Text, Modified"
        Output: ="Text, Modified"

Not something blocking public preview, but we should look at this as we add the other metadata for property parameters.

@gregli-msft gregli-msft self-assigned this Dec 17, 2020
@gregli-msft gregli-msft changed the title Input and output properties should be better differentiated Custom component Input and output properties should be better differentiated Dec 17, 2020
@MikeStall MikeStall added the breaking Breaking change (file format update) label Jan 23, 2021
@jt000 jt000 added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 18, 2022
@landonmsft landonmsft removed the breaking Breaking change (file format update) label Dec 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants