Replies: 1 comment
-
Apologies for the late reply. Yep, that would make sense, so sampling will probably be pretty slow with large models. You could constrain the growth rates with what you got from cooperative tradeoff and then sample from that. Unfortunately, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi!
I am modelling a couple of community metabolic states using min_growth like this:
Any advice in terms of running random flux sampling while constraining growth like so and using cooperative_tradeoff? Would this even make any sense or is the solution from cooperative_tradeoff "unique" when it comes to fluxes plus growth tradeoffs?
I imagine that I could specify min_growth values as lower bounds for the biomass reaction of each of the corresponding members of the community, and then run something like
cobra.sampling.sample()
but that would generate solutions without considering the implications around cooperative_tradeoff?Cheers!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions